Enhanced yield of diverse varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by different isolates of Mesorhizobium ciceri

被引:0
作者
Ram Prakash Pandey
Alok Kumar Srivastava
Vijai Kumar Gupta
Anthonia O’Donovan
Pramod Wasudeo Ramteke
机构
[1] Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture,Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology
[2] Technology and Sciences,Department of Life and Physical Sciences, School of Science and Computing
[3] National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microbes,undefined
[4] Tallinn University of Technology,undefined
[5] Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology,undefined
关键词
Chickpea; PGPB; Nodulation;
D O I
10.1007/s42398-018-00039-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In present investigation, six potential candidates of Mesorhizobium ciceri were isolated from five different districts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh and were characterized based on biochemical characteristics as well as 16S rDNA sequences. Isolates were analyzed for their multiple plant growth promoting traits, resistance to various environmental stresses such as temperature, pH and salt and were tested individually for growth and yield of three popular varieties of chickpea viz. Avarodi, Uday and PUSA-372, cultivated in the mid-Gangetic region of India. All the isolates exhibited siderophore production and were able to solubilize the inorganic phosphate and zinc. Among total, 50% isolates were found positive to produce ammonia and HCN whereas, IAA production was exhibited in 33.3% isolates. Most of the isolates were found able to tolerate environmental stresses. The growth and yield of Avarodhi and Uday chickpea varieties were found significantly higher when treated with M. ciceri strain S3N1 while in variety PUSA-372 it was exhibited when treated with M. ciceri strain VAR2.2. Present investigation concluded that a particular M. ciceri strain might not be wholly effective for a wide range of chickpea varieties. These strains may be effective bioinoculant for the growth and yield enhancement of chickpea.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 435
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Ethephon Doses and Application Times on Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Guler, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2009, 15 (04): : 301 - 309
  • [42] Process optimization of chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) seed protein isolates for functional foods
    Anusha, Ramani
    Deepti, Singh
    Vinita, Puranik
    Rajendra, Kumar
    Neelam, Yadav
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 16 (02): : 163 - 172
  • [43] The effect of bacterial inoculation and different nitrogen doses on yield and yield components of some chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Karasu, A.
    Oz, M.
    Dogan, R.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [44] THE INFLUENCE OF INOCULATION AND NITROGEN TREATMENTS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CULTIVARS
    Kagan, S.
    Kayan, N.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (04) : 363 - 371
  • [45] Study of direct selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Dubey, Kashyap Kumar
    Srivastava, S. B. L.
    PLANT ARCHIVES, 2007, 7 (01): : 211 - 212
  • [46] Integrated weed management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Merga, Bulti
    Alemu, Nano
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [47] An efficient transformation system for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    G. Senthil
    B. Williamson
    R. D. Dinkins
    G. Ramsay
    Plant Cell Reports, 2004, 23 : 297 - 303
  • [48] The physiological effects of different irrigation times on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars
    Kayan, Nihal
    Turhan, Ece
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (3-4): : 506 - 510
  • [49] Varietal Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Towards the Allelopathy of Different Weeds
    Khan, Rahamdad
    Khan, Ijaz Ahmad
    SAINS MALAYSIANA, 2015, 44 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [50] IMPACT OF VARIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT APPROACHES ON THE YIELD OF CHICKPEA CICER ARIETINUM L. CROP
    Khan, Ijaz Ahmad
    Hussain, Zahid
    Ullah, Zaheen
    Khan, Rahamdad
    Hassan, Gul
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2018, 50 (02) : 635 - 638