An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research

被引:12
作者
Joe F. Hair
Marko Sarstedt
Christian M. Ringle
Jeannette A. Mena
机构
[1] Kennesaw State University,
[2] KSU Center,undefined
[3] DBA Program,undefined
[4] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU),undefined
[5] Institute for Market-based Management (IMM),undefined
[6] University of Newcastle,undefined
[7] Faculty of Business and Law,undefined
[8] Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH),undefined
[9] Institute for Human Resource Management and Organizations (HRMO),undefined
[10] University of South Florida,undefined
[11] College of Business,undefined
来源
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 2012年 / 40卷
关键词
Empirical research methods; Partial least squares; Path modeling; Structural equation modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most methodological fields undertake regular critical reflections to ensure rigorous research and publication practices, and, consequently, acceptance in their domain. Interestingly, relatively little attention has been paid to assessing the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in marketing research—despite its increasing popularity in recent years. To fill this gap, we conducted an extensive search in the 30 top ranked marketing journals that allowed us to identify 204 PLS-SEM applications published in a 30-year period (1981 to 2010). A critical analysis of these articles addresses, amongst others, the following key methodological issues: reasons for using PLS-SEM, data and model characteristics, outer and inner model evaluations, and reporting. We also give an overview of the interdependencies between researchers’ choices, identify potential problem areas, and discuss their implications. On the basis of our findings, we provide comprehensive guidelines to aid researchers in avoiding common pitfalls in PLS-SEM use. This study is important for researchers and practitioners, as PLS-SEM requires several critical choices that, if not made correctly, can lead to improper findings, interpretations, and conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 433
页数:19
相关论文
共 162 条
[31]  
Coltman T(2002)Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach Schmalenbach Business Review 54 243-269
[32]  
Devinney TM(2011)PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 139-151
[33]  
Midgley DF(2010)On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm Computational Statistics 25 107-120
[34]  
Venaik S(2010)A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 17 82-109
[35]  
Diamantopoulos A(2009)The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing Advances in international marketing 20 277-319
[36]  
Diamantopoulos A(1999)Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies Strategic Management Journal 20 195-204
[37]  
Siguaw JA(1997)Faculty perceptions of marketing journals Journal of Marketing Education 19 37-52
[38]  
Diamantopoulos A(2009)Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: Rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations GlobalEDGE Business Review 3 1-23
[39]  
Winklhofer HM(2010)A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling Journal of Marketing Research 47 699-712
[40]  
Diamantopoulos A(2007)A modified PLS path modeling algorithm handling reflective categorical variables and a new model building strategy Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 3666-3678