What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research

被引:0
作者
C. Mirjam van Praag
Peter H. Versloot
机构
[1] Amsterdam Center for Entrepreneurship,
[2] University of Amsterdam,undefined
[3] Tinbergen Institute,undefined
[4] Max Planck Institute of Economics,undefined
[5] IZA Institute for the Study of Labour,undefined
来源
Small Business Economics | 2007年 / 29卷
关键词
Entrepreneur; Entrepreneurship; Self-employment; Productivity; Economic development; Growth; Employment; Innovation; Patents; R&D; Utility; Remuneration; Income; D24; D31; E23; E24; J21; J28; J31; L26; M13;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines to what extent recent empirical evidence can collectively and systematically substantiate the claim that entrepreneurship has important economic value. Hence, a systematic review is provided that answers the question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy in comparison to non-entrepreneurs? We study the relative contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy based on four measures that have most widely been studied empirically. Hence, we answer the question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to (i) employment generation and dynamics, (ii) innovation, and (iii) productivity and growth, relative to the contributions of the entrepreneurs’ counterparts, i.e., the ‘control group’? A fourth type of contribution studied is the role of entrepreneurship in increasing individuals’ utility levels. Based on 57 recent studies of high quality that contain 87 relevant separate analyses, we conclude that entrepreneurs have a very important—but specific—function in the economy. They engender relatively much employment creation, productivity growth and produce and commercialize high-quality innovations. They are more satisfied than employees. More importantly, recent studies show that entrepreneurial firms produce important spillovers that affect regional employment growth rates of all companies in the region in the long run. However, the counterparts cannot be missed either as they account for a relatively high value of GDP, a less volatile and more secure labor market, higher paid jobs and a greater number of innovations and they have a more active role in the adoption of innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 382
页数:31
相关论文
共 160 条
[41]  
Carree M. A.(2001)On the growth of micro and small firms: Evidence from Sweden Small Business Economics 17 213-228
[42]  
Carrington W. J.(2006)Resource and capability constraints to innovation in small and large plants Small Business Economics 26 257-277
[43]  
McCue K.(2000)Horatio Alger meets the mobility tables Small Business Economics 14 243-274
[44]  
Pierce B.(2004)How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics 22 193-207
[45]  
Caves R. E.(2001)The impact of vintage and survival on productivity: Evidence from cohorts of U.S. manufacturing plants The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 323-332
[46]  
Chandrashekaran M.(2005)The turnover of firms and industry growth Small Business Economics 24 487-495
[47]  
Sinha R. K.(2005)R&D subsidy and self-financed R&D: The case of Japanese high-technology start-ups Small Business Economics 24 53-62
[48]  
Clark A. E.(1995)Gross job flows and the evolution of size in U.K. establishments Small Business Economics 7 213-220
[49]  
Oswald A. J.(2000)Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation The RAND Journal of Economics 31 674-692
[50]  
Cowling M.(1996)Firm size and employment determination in Dutch manufacturing industries Small Business Economics 8 389-396