What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research

被引:0
作者
C. Mirjam van Praag
Peter H. Versloot
机构
[1] Amsterdam Center for Entrepreneurship,
[2] University of Amsterdam,undefined
[3] Tinbergen Institute,undefined
[4] Max Planck Institute of Economics,undefined
[5] IZA Institute for the Study of Labour,undefined
来源
Small Business Economics | 2007年 / 29卷
关键词
Entrepreneur; Entrepreneurship; Self-employment; Productivity; Economic development; Growth; Employment; Innovation; Patents; R&D; Utility; Remuneration; Income; D24; D31; E23; E24; J21; J28; J31; L26; M13;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines to what extent recent empirical evidence can collectively and systematically substantiate the claim that entrepreneurship has important economic value. Hence, a systematic review is provided that answers the question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy in comparison to non-entrepreneurs? We study the relative contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy based on four measures that have most widely been studied empirically. Hence, we answer the question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to (i) employment generation and dynamics, (ii) innovation, and (iii) productivity and growth, relative to the contributions of the entrepreneurs’ counterparts, i.e., the ‘control group’? A fourth type of contribution studied is the role of entrepreneurship in increasing individuals’ utility levels. Based on 57 recent studies of high quality that contain 87 relevant separate analyses, we conclude that entrepreneurs have a very important—but specific—function in the economy. They engender relatively much employment creation, productivity growth and produce and commercialize high-quality innovations. They are more satisfied than employees. More importantly, recent studies show that entrepreneurial firms produce important spillovers that affect regional employment growth rates of all companies in the region in the long run. However, the counterparts cannot be missed either as they account for a relatively high value of GDP, a less volatile and more secure labor market, higher paid jobs and a greater number of innovations and they have a more active role in the adoption of innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 382
页数:31
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Acs Z. J.(2005)Entrepreneurship, innovation and technological change Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 1 1-65
[2]  
Audretsch D. B.(1996)Innovation of entrepreneurial firms Small Business Economics 8 203-218
[3]  
Acs Z. J.(2005)Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change Small Business Economics 24 323-334
[4]  
Gifford S.(1997)The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation Small Business Economics 9 21-31
[5]  
Acs Z. J.(2005)Watch that space! The county hierarchy in firm births and deaths in the UK, 1980–1999 Small Business Economics 25 273-292
[6]  
Varga A.(1997)The impact of firm size on innovative activity–an empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data Small Business Economics 9 473-490
[7]  
Almeida P.(2005)The winner’s curse of human capital Small Business Economics 24 63-78
[8]  
Kogut B.(2002)Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty Kyklos 55 81-98
[9]  
Anyadike-Danes M.(1996)Firm size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy Small Business Economics 8 249-258
[10]  
Hart M.(1998)Were small producers the engines of growth in the Canadian manufacturing sector in the 1980s? Small Business Economics 10 349-364