Defining neurotrauma in administrative data using the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision

被引：38

作者：

Chen A.Y. ^{[1
]}

Colantonio A. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto

[2] Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto

来源：

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology | / 8卷 / 1期

关键词：

Traumatic Brain Injury; Brain Injury; Spinal Cord Injury; Crush Injury; Facial Fracture;

D O I：

10.1186/1742-7622-8-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: It is essential to use a definition that is precise and accurate for the surveillance of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI). This paper reviews the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) definitions used internationally to inform the definition for neurotrauma surveillance using administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Medline and the grey literature were searched for keywords "spinal cord injuries" or "brain injuries" and "international classification of diseases". All papers and reports that used an ICD-10 definition were included. To determine the ICD-10 codes for inclusion consensus across papers and additional evidence were sought to look at the correlation between the condition and brain or spinal injuries. Results: Twenty-four articles and reports were identified; 15 unique definitions for TBI and 7 for SCI were found. The definitions recommended for use in Ontario by this paper are F07.2, S02.0, S02.1, S02.3, S02.7, S02.8, S02.9, S06, S07.1, T90.2, and T90.5 for traumatic brain injuries and S14.0, S14.1, S24.0, S24.1, S34.1, S34.0, S34.3, T06.0, T06.1 and T91.3 for spinal cord injuries. Conclusions: Internationally, inconsistent definitions are used to define brain and spinal cord injuries. An abstraction study of data would be an asset in understanding the effects of inclusion and exclusion of codes in the definition. This paper offers a definition of neurotrauma for surveillance in Ontario, but the definition could be applied to other countries that have mandated administrative data collection. © 2011 Chen and Colantonio; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

引用

共 38 条

[1]

Thurman D.J., Kraus J.F., Romer C.J., Standards for Surveillance of Neurotrauma, (1995)

[2]

Holder Y., Peden M., Krug E., Lund J., Gururaj G., Eds K.O., Injury Surveillance Guidelines, (2001)

[3]

Marr A.L., Coronado V.G., Central Nervous System Injury Surveillance Data Submission Standards - 2002, (2004)

[4]

Colantonio A., Croxford R., Farooq S., Laporte A., Coyte P.C., Trends in Hospitalization Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in a Publicly Insured Population, 1992-2002, J Trauma, 66, 1, (2009)

[5]

Tagliaferri F., Compagnone C., Korsic M., Servadei F., Kraus J., A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 148, 3, pp. 255-68, (2006)

[6]

Couris C.M., Guilcher S.J., Munce S.E., Fung K., Craven B.C., Verrier M., Jaglal S.B., Characteristics of adults with incident traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada, Spinal Cord, 48, 1, pp. 39-44, (2010)

[7]

Wyndaele M., Wyndaele J.-J., Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature survey?, Spinal Cord, 44, 9, pp. 523-529, (2006)

[8]

Langlois J.A., Rutland-Brown W., Thomas K.E., Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, (2004)

[9]

Cassidy J.D., Carroll L.J., Peloso P.M., Borg J., Von Holst H., Holm L., Kraus J., Coronado V.G., Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Supplement, 43, pp. 28-60, (2004)

[10]

Head Injuries in Canada: A Decade of Change (1994-1995 to 2003-2004), (2006)

← 1 2 3 4 →