Controversies in the Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Using Highly Sensitive Techniques

被引:0
作者
Noa Biran
Scott Ely
Ajai Chari
机构
[1] Hackensack University Medical Center,John Theurer Cancer Center
[2] Weill Medical College of Cornell University,Division of Hematopathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
[3] Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and The Tisch Cancer Institute
来源
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Minimal residual disease; Multiple myeloma; Multiparameter flow cytometry; Polymerase chain reaction; Next-generation sequencing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has gained importance in the response evaluation of multiple myeloma. As discussed in part 1 of this two-part series, techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, of both bone marrow and peripheral blood, have the potential to achieve a high level of sensitivity, up to 1 in 10−6 cells, enabling analysis of genetically diverse subclones. Here, we review the clinical utility of MRD assessment using these techniques. Specifically, we review the association between MRD-negativity and progression-free or overall survival in various clinical settings (post-induction, post-auto or allo-stem cell transplant, transplant ineligible, maintenance, and relapsed/refractory). Currently, the goal of assessing MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is to allow for a risk-stratified approach to therapy and for earlier identification of response to novel agents, particularly in the setting of clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Cavo M(2007)Prospective, randomized study of single compared with double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Bologna 96 clinical study J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 25 2434-2441
[2]  
Alvares CL(2005)Long-term outcomes of previously untreated myeloma patients: responses to induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan incorporated within a risk stratification model can help to direct the use of novel treatments Br J Haematol 129 607-614
[3]  
Barlogie B(1999)Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Blood 93 55-65
[4]  
Child JA(2003)High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 348 1875-1883
[5]  
Richardson PG(2010)Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Blood 116 679-686
[6]  
Attal M(2012)Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 366 1782-1791
[7]  
McCarthy PL(2012)Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 366 1770-1781
[8]  
Mateos MV(2010)Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial Lancet Oncol 11 934-941
[9]  
Kumar S(2012)Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma Blood 119 4375-4382
[10]  
Cavo M(2000)Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients in long-term complete remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma Blood 96 355-357