Elucidating Best Geospatial Estimation Method Applied to Environmental Sciences

被引:0
作者
María de Lourdes Berrios Cintrón
Parya Broomandi
Jafet Cárdenas-Escudero
Jorge O. Cáceres
David Galán-Madruga
机构
[1] Inter American University of Puerto Rico,Department of Health Sciences
[2] Nazarbayev University,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences
[3] FCNET,Analytical Chemistry Department
[4] University of Panama,Laser Chemistry Research Group, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry
[5] University City,National Reference Laboratory of Air Quality
[6] University Mail,undefined
[7] Complutense University of Madrid,undefined
[8] National Centre for Environmental Health (CNSA),undefined
[9] Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII),undefined
来源
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology | 2024年 / 112卷
关键词
Air Quality; PM; Particles; Geostatistical Estimation; Interpolation Algorithms and Environmental Sciences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to assess and identify the most suitable geospatial interpolation algorithm for environmental sciences. The research focuses on evaluating six different interpolation methods using annual average PM10 concentrations as a reference dataset. The dataset includes measurements obtained from a target air quality network (scenery 1) and a sub-dataset derived from a partitive clustering technique (scenery 2). By comparing the performance of each interpolation algorithm using various indicators, the study aims to determine the most reliable method. The findings reveal that the kriging method demonstrates the highest performance within environmental sciences, with a spatial similarity of approximately 70% between the two scenery datasets. The performance indicators for the kriging method, including RMSE (root mean square error), MAE (mean absolute error), and MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), are measured at 3.2 µg/m3, 10.2 µg/m3, and 7.3%, respectively.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Ahasan R(2022)Applications of geospatial analyses in health research among homeless people: a systematic scoping review of available evidence Health Policy Technol 11 100647-294
[2]  
Alam MS(2011)Network optimization algorithms and scenarios in the context of automatic mapping Comput Geosci 37 289-460
[3]  
Chakraborty T(2022)Remediation of groundwater contaminated with dye using carbon dots technology: Ecotoxicological and microbial community responses J Environ Manage 319 115634-186
[4]  
Ali SMA(2023)Health risk assessment of the European inhabitants exposed to contaminated ambient particulate matter by potentially toxic elements Environ Pollut 323 121232-599
[5]  
Alam TB(2023)Air quality trends and implications pre and post Covid-19 restrictions Sci Total Environ 879 162833-147
[6]  
Islan T(2022)Spatio-temporal characteristics of PM IJERPH 19 6292-174
[7]  
Hossain MM(2023) concentrations in China based on multiple sources of data and LUR-GBM during 2016–2021 Appl Numer Math 184 446-2613
[8]  
Baume OP(2022)On the improvement of the triangular Shepard method by non conformal polynomial elements J Hydrol 613 128448-126
[9]  
Gebhardt A(1996)Bridging environmental geochemistry and hydrology Computers Math Applic 31 179-629
[10]  
Gebhardt C(2018)Minimum curvature Multistep Quasi-newton methods Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100 593-195