The effect of growth stage and plant counting accuracy of maize inbred lines on LAI and biomass prediction

被引:0
作者
Yingpu Che
Qing Wang
Long Zhou
Xiqing Wang
Baoguo Li
Yuntao Ma
机构
[1] Ministry of Natural Resources,College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Land Quality
[2] China Agricultural University,Centre for Crop Functional Genomics and Molecular Breeding
来源
Precision Agriculture | 2022年 / 23卷
关键词
UAV; Plant counting; LAI; AGB; L.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate maize plant counting plays an essential role in prediction of leaf area index (LAI), aboveground biomass (AGB) and yield. Plant counting of maize inbred lines at early growth stage will result in counting bias caused by death and growth of small seedlings. Therefore, the estimation of LAI and AGB might be negatively affected by plant counting bias at early growth stage. In this study, morphologic discrimination model (MDM) and interpolation discriminant model (IDM) were proposed for plant counting of maize inbred lines at second to fourth (V2–V4) leaf and fourth to sixth (V4–V6) leaf stages with different uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) flight heights. Automatic optimum angle calculation of each row, location-based plant cluster segmentation and mosaic method were presented to improve the estimation accuracy of plant counting. Then, the impact of accurate plant counting was evaluated in LAI and AGB prediction at the two growth stages. The results indicated that germination rate difference of some inbred lines could reach up to 38% between V2–V4 and V4–V6 leaf stages. The proposed method accurately estimated the plant counting in the UAV images during V2–V4 leaf stage (R2 = 0.98, RMSE = 7.7, rRMSE = 2.6%) and V4–V6 leaf stage (R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 2.0, rRMSE = 5.5%). The estimated LAI and AGB with plant numbers calculated at V4–V6 leaf stage correlated better with the field measurements (R2 = 0.85 and R2 = 0.9, respectively) compared with those estimated at V2–V4 leaf stage (R2 = 0.8 and R2 = 0.86, respectively). This research indicates that better estimation of LAI and AGB in the field were obtained by accurate plant counting in the late growth stage using UAV images and provides valuable insight for more accurate prediction of yield and crop management and breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:2159 / 2185
页数:26
相关论文
共 246 条
[1]  
Abid Hasan SM(2016)Depth edge detection by image-based smoothing and morphological operations Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 3 191-197
[2]  
Ko K(2020)Image-based high-throughput phenotyping of cereals early vigour and weed-competitiveness traits Remote Sensing 12 3877-4949
[3]  
Aharon S(2018)Analysis of long-term study indicates both agronomic optimal plant density and increase maize yield per plant contributed to yield gain Scientific Reports 8 4937-87
[4]  
Peleg Z(2015)Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 39 79-700
[5]  
Argaman E(2019)A high-throughput model-assisted method for phenotyping maize green leaf area index dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery Frontiers in Plant Science 10 685-773
[6]  
Ben-David R(2020)Estimation of maize plant height and leaf area index dynamics using an unmanned aerial vehicle with oblique and nadir photography Annals of Botany 126 765-143
[7]  
Lati RN(2019)Assessment of red-edge vegetation indices for crop leaf area index estimation Remote Sensing of Environment 222 133-887
[8]  
Assefa Y(2018)Automatic tobacco plant detection in UAV images via deep neural networks IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 11 876-105726
[9]  
Carter P(2020)Evaluation of cotton emergence using UAV-based imagery and deep learning Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 177 105711-42
[10]  
Hinds M(2018)Physical properties of maize seed and its effect on sowing quality and variable distance of individual plants Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 66 35-111