CPT-based Seismic Liquefaction Potential Evaluation Using Multi-gene Genetic Programming Approach

被引:44
作者
Muduli P.K. [1 ]
Das S.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela
关键词
Artificial neural network; Cone penetration test; Liquefaction; Liquefaction index; Multi-gene genetic programming; Support vector machine;
D O I
10.1007/s40098-013-0048-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the potential of multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) based classification approach to evaluate liquefaction potential of soil in terms liquefaction index (LI) using a large database from post liquefaction cone penetration test (CPT) measurements and field manifestations. The database consists of CPT measurements; cone tip resistance (q c), friction ratio (R f), vertical total stress (σ v) and vertical effective stress of soil (σ v ′), seismic parameters; peak horizontal ground surface acceleration (a max) and earthquake moment magnitude (M w), and the depth under consideration (z). The MGGP models (Model-I and Model-II) are developed for predicting occurrence and non-occurrence of liquefaction on basis of combination of above input parameters. The performance of the Model-I (95 %) is found to be more efficient compared to available artificial neural network model (91 %) and that of the Model-II (97 %) is found to be at par with the available support vector machine model (97 %) in terms of rate of successful prediction of liquefied and non-liquefied cases for testing data. Using an independent database of 96 cases, the overall classification accuracies are found to be 87 and 86 % for Model-I and Model-II respectively. Sensitivity analyses are made to identify the important parameters contributing to the prediction of LI. © 2013 Indian Geotechnical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Krammer S.L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, (1996)
[2]  
Seed H.B., Idris I.M., Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, J Soil Mech Found Div, 97, 9, pp. 1249-1273, (1971)
[3]  
Seed H.B., Tokimatsu K., Harder L.F., Chung R., Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations, J Geotech Eng, 111, 12, pp. 1425-1445, (1985)
[4]  
Robertson P.K., Campanella R.G., Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT, J Geotech Eng, 111, 3, pp. 384-403, (1985)
[5]  
Shibata T., Teparaksa W., Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil using cone penetration tests, Soils Found, 28, 2, pp. 49-60, (1988)
[6]  
Olsen R.S., Cyclic liquefaction based on cone penetrometer test, Proceeding of NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, pp. 225-276, (1997)
[7]  
Robertson P.K., Wride C.E., Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using cone penetration test, Can Geotech J, 35, 3, pp. 442-459, (1998)
[8]  
Juang C.H., Yuan H., Lee D.H., Lin P.S., Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 129, 1, pp. 66-80, (2003)
[9]  
Goh A.T.C., Neural-network modeling of CPT seismic liquefaction data, J Geotech Eng, 122, 1, pp. 70-73, (1996)
[10]  
Samui P., Sitharam T.G., Machine learning modelling for predicting soil liquefaction susceptibility, Nat Hazards Earth Sci, 11, pp. 1-9, (2011)