Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?

被引:1
作者
Monica Celi
Cecilia Rao
Alessandro Scialdoni
Valerio Tempesta
Elena Gasbarra
Pietro Pistillo
Umberto Tarantino
机构
[1] University of Rome “Tor Vergata”,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation,undefined
来源
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research | 2013年 / 25卷
关键词
Bone mineral density; Osteoporosis; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Fracture risk;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Osteoporosis is a diffuse skeletal disease in which a decrease in bone strength leads to an increased risk of fractures. A wide variety of types of bone densitometry measurements are available, including quantitative computed tomography measurements of the spine, quantitative ultrasound devices for measurements of the heel and other peripheral sites and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, forearm and total body scans. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques, hip and spine DXA examinations have a number of advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organization T score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, proven effectiveness at targeting anti-fracture therapies, and the ability to monitor response to treatment. However, in recent years, the authors have raised some important questions about the objective limits of this method that have led to doubts about its effectiveness in terms of clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 49
页数:2
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Nuti R(2001)Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy JAMA 285 785-795
[2]  
Brandi LM(2009)New perspectives on the definition and the management of severe osteoporosis: the patient with two or more fragility fractures J Endocrinol Invest Oct 32 783-788
[3]  
Isaia G(2000)Different approaches to bone densitometry J Nucl Med 41 2015-2025
[4]  
Fogeman I(2009)The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129 251-257
[5]  
Blake GM(2001)Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities J B Miner Res 16 901-910
[6]  
De Klerk G(2000)An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry Osteoporos Int 11 192-202
[7]  
van der Velde D(2002)Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitomet 5 S11-S17
[8]  
van der Palen J(2009)The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Europ J Radiol 71 406-414
[9]  
Lu Y(2004)Impact of degenerative spinal diseases on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in elderly women Osteoporos Int 15 724-728
[10]  
Genant HK(2007)Discriminative ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry site selection in identifying patients with osteoporotic fractures Bone 40 1060-1065