Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration

被引:17
作者
Kim S.-G. [1 ]
Kim M.-K. [1 ]
Kweon H.Y. [2 ]
Jo Y.-Y. [2 ]
Lee K.-G. [2 ]
Lee J.K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangwondo, Gangneung
[2] Sericultural and Apicultural Materials Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Suwon
[3] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon
关键词
Bone defect; Guided bone regeneration; Membrane; Silk cocoon;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Silk cocoon is composed of multiple layers. The natural silk cocoon containing all layers was cut as a rectangular shape as defined as total group. The inner and outermost layers were removed from the total group and the remained mat was defined as the middle group. The objectives of this study was to compare the total group with the middle group as a barrier membrane for the guided bone regeneration. Methods: The effects of these materials on the cellular proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression of MG63 cells were explored. For comparing bone regeneration ability, bilateral bone defects were created in calvarial areas in ten adult New Zealand white rabbits. The defects were covered with silk membranes of the middle group, with silk membrane of the total group used as the control on the contralateral side. The defects were allowed to heal for 4 and 8 weeks. Micro-computerized tomography (μCT) and histological examination were performed. Results: The middle group exhibited a higher MTT value 48 and 72 h after treatment compared to the total group. ALP expression was also higher in the middle group. The results of μCT and histologic examination showed that new bone formation was significantly higher in the middle group compared to the total group 8 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, the middle layer of the silk cocoon supports guided bone regeneration better than unprocessed silk cocoon. © 2016, Kim et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Hammerle C.H., Jung R.E., Feloutzis A., A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients, J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp. 226-231, (2002)
[2]  
Bassett C.A., Campbell J.B., Girado J.M., Rossi J.P., Seymour R.J., Application of monomolecular filter tubes in bridging gaps in peripheral nerves and for prevention of neuroma formation
[3]  
a preliminary report, J Neurosurg, 13, pp. 635-637, (1956)
[4]  
Dahlin C., Linde A., Gottlow J., Nyman S., Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration, Plast Reconstr Surg, 81, pp. 672-676, (1988)
[5]  
Dimitriou R., Mataliotakis G.I., Calori G.M., Giannoudis P.V., The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence, BMC Med, 10, (2012)
[6]  
Rothamel D., Schwarz F., Sculean A., Herten M., Scherbaum W., Becker J., Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast-like cells, Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp. 443-449, (2004)
[7]  
Lundgren D., Sennerby L., Falk H., Friberg B., Nyman S., The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case reports, Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, pp. 177-184, (1994)
[8]  
Roccuzzo M., Ramieri G., Spada M.C., Bianchi S.D., Berrone S., Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts, Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp. 73-81, (2004)
[9]  
Zahedi S., Legrand R., Brunel G., Albert A., Dewe W., Coumans B., Et al., Evaluation of a diphenylphosphorylazide-crosslinked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats, J Periodontol, 69, pp. 1238-1246, (1998)
[10]  
Rothamel D., Schwarz F., Sager M., Herten M., Sculean A., Becker J., Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat, Clin Oral Impl Res, 16, pp. 369-378, (2005)