Normal ventricular diameter ratio on CT provides adequate assessment for critical right ventricular strain among patients with acute pulmonary embolism

被引:0
作者
Kanako K. Kumamaru
Elizabeth George
Nina Ghosh
Carlos Gonzalez Quesada
Nicole Wake
Marie Gerhard-Herman
Frank J. Rybicki
机构
[1] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology
[2] Harvard Medical School,Department of Radiology
[3] Juntendo Univeristy,Department of Medicine
[4] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,The Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences
[5] Harvard Medical School,The Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
[6] New York University,undefined
[7] The University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine,undefined
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2016年 / 32卷
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; Clinical guidelines; Computed tomography angiography; Right ventricular dysfunction; Echocardiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is variability in guideline recommendations for assessment of the right ventricle (RV) with imaging as prognostic information after acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The objective of this study is to identify a clinical scenario for which normal CT-derived right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio is sufficient to exclude RV strain or PE-related short-term death. This retrospective cohort study included 579 consecutive subjects (08/2003-03/2010) diagnosed with acute PE with normal CT-RV/LV ratio (<0.9), 236 of whom received subsequent echocardiography. To identify a clinical scenario for which CT-RV/LV ratio was considered sufficient to exclude RV strain or PE-related short-term death, a multivariable logistic model was created to detect factors related to subjects for whom subsequent echocardiography detected RV strain or those who did not receive echocardiography and died of PE within 14 days (n = 55). The final model included five variables (c-statistic = 0.758, over-fitting bias = 2.52 %): congestive heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, OR 4.32, 95 % confidence interval, CI 1.88–9.92), RV diameter on CT >45 mm (OR 3.07, 95 % CI 1.56–6.03), age >60 years (OR 2.59, 95 % CI 1.41–4.77), central embolus (OR 1.96, 95 % CI 1.01–3.79), and stage-IV cancer (OR 1.94, 95 % CI 0.99–3.78). If these five factors were all absent (37.1 % of the population), the probability that “CT-RV/LV ratio is sufficient to exclude RV strain/PE-related short-term death” was 0.97 (95 % CI = 0.95–0.99). Normal CT-RV/LV ratio plus readily obtained five clinical predictors were adequate to exclude RV strain or PE-related short-term mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1161
页数:8
相关论文
共 260 条
  • [1] Goldhaber SZ(2004)Pulmonary embolism Lancet 363 1295-1305
  • [2] Grifoni S(2000)Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction Circulation 101 2817-2822
  • [3] Olivotto I(1992)The clinical course of pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med 326 1240-1245
  • [4] Cecchini P(2008)Acute pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med 358 1037-1052
  • [5] Pieralli F(2011)Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 123 1788-1830
  • [6] Camaiti A(2008)Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition) Chest 133 110S-112S
  • [7] Santoro G(2012)Appropriate use of screening and diagnostic tests to foster high-value, cost-conscious care Ann Intern Med 156 147-149
  • [8] Conti A(2012)Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Chest 141 7S-47S
  • [9] Agnelli G(2012)Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Chest 141 e419S-e494S
  • [10] Berni G(2005)Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172 1041-1046