Effect of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary artery intervention: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial

被引:0
作者
Atsushi Tanaka
Sho Komukai
Yoshisato Shibata
Hiroyoshi Yokoi
Yoshihiro Iwasaki
Tomohiro Kawasaki
Kenji Horiuchi
Koichi Nakao
Takafumi Ueno
Hitoshi Nakashima
Masahiro Tamashiro
Yutaka Hikichi
Mitsuhiro Shimomura
Motoko Tago
Shigeru Toyoda
Teruo Inoue
Atsushi Kawaguchi
Koichi Node
机构
[1] Saga University,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[2] Saga University Hospital,Clinical Research Center
[3] Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[4] Cardiovascular Center,Department of Cardiology
[5] Kokura Memorial Hospital,Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center
[6] Nagasaki Kouseikai Hospital,Division of Cardiology
[7] Shin-Koga Hospital,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine
[8] Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Cardiovascular Center,Department of Cardiology
[9] Kurume University School of Medicine,Department of Cardiology
[10] National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[11] Tomishiro Central Hospital,undefined
[12] Dokkyo Medical University,undefined
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2018年 / 33卷
关键词
Pioglitazone; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Adiponectin; Cardiac function; Percutaneous coronary intervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pioglitazone has superior antiatherosclerotic effects compared with other classes of antidiabetic agents, and there is substantial evidence that pioglitazone improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, there is also a potential risk of worsening heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is clinically important to determine whether pioglitazone is safe in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who require treatment for secondary prevention of CV disease, since they have an intrinsically higher risk of HF. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized study investigated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiometabolic profiles and CV safety in T2DM patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using bare-metal stents or first-generation drug-eluting stents. A total of 94 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either a pioglitazone or conventional (control) group, and pioglitazone was started the day before PCI. Cardiometabolic profiles were evaluated before PCI and at primary follow-up coronary angiography (5–8 months). Pioglitazone treatment reduced HbA1c levels to a similar degree as conventional treatment (pioglitazone group 6.5 to 6.0%, P < 0.01; control group 6.5 to 5.9%, P < 0.001), without body weight gain. Levels of high-molecular weight adiponectin increased more in the pioglitazone group than the control group (P < 0.001), and the changes were irrespective of baseline glycemic control. Furthermore, pioglitazone significantly reduced plasma levels of natriuretic peptides and preserved cardiac systolic and diastolic function (assessed by echocardiography) without incident hospitalization for worsening HF. The incidence of clinical adverse events was also comparable between the groups. These results indicate that pioglitazone treatment before and after elective PCI may be tolerable and clinically safe and may improve cardiometabolic profiles in T2DM patients.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 977
页数:12
相关论文
共 557 条
[1]  
Sarwar N(2010)Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies Lancet 375 2215-2222
[2]  
Gao P(2011)Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death N Engl J Med 364 829-841
[3]  
Seshasai SR(2016)Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus and patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Cardiovasc Disord 16 238-481
[4]  
Gobin R(2014)Everolimus-eluting Xience v/Promus versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in patients with diabetes mellitus JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7 471-1162
[5]  
Kaptoge S(2011)Comparison of three-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation among insulin-treated diabetic, non-insulin-treated diabetic, and non-diabetic patients from j-Cypher registry Am J Cardiol 107 1155-2278
[6]  
Di Angelantonio E(2004)Impact of sirolimus-eluting stents on outcome in diabetic patients: a SIRIUS (SIRolImUS-coated Bx Velocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions) substudy Circulation 109 2273-662
[7]  
Ingelsson E(2016)Insulin resistance as a predictor of the late catch-up phenomenon after drug-eluting stent implantation Circ J 80 657-10
[8]  
Lawlor DA(2015)Influence of insulin resistance on in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation after long-term angiographic follow-up Coron Artery Dis 26 5-1167
[9]  
Selvin E(2012)Impact of insulin resistance on post-procedural myocardial injury and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent elective coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5 1159-645
[10]  
Stampfer M(2008)Thiazolidinediones: effects on insulin resistance and the cardiovascular system Br J Pharmacol 153 636-719