Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: Why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

被引:25
作者
Grant D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, University of Texas, Arlington, Box 19479, Arlington
关键词
Cesarean section; Physician practice style; Private insurance; Source of payment;
D O I
10.1007/s10729-005-5212-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The difference in the risk-adjusted cesarean rates of mothers who are and who are not privately insured is divided into components attributable to the following four factors: the practice style of the physician attending the birth, the closeness of the physician-mother relationship, individual nonclinical factors, and the direct influence of private insurance on the physician's treatment decision. Estimates from two expansive, complementary data sets indicate that the most of the differential is attributable to the first two factors, particularly the pairing of privately insured mothers with physicians who are inclined to perform cesareans. There is some evidence that these pairings are not incidental but the result of firm (and possibly consumer) choices. © 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 17
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Abitbol M., Castillo I., Taylor U., Rochester B., Shmoys S., Monheit A., Vaginal birth after cesarean section: The patient's point of view, American Family Physician, 47, pp. 129-134, (1993)
  • [2] Anderson G.M., Lomas J., Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: Patients, facilities or policies?, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 132, pp. 253-259, (1985)
  • [3] Aron D., Gordon H., Digiuseppe D., Harper D., Rosenthal G., Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance, Medical Care, 38, 1, pp. 35-114, (2000)
  • [4] Baker L., Royalty A., Medicaid policy, physician behavior and health care for the low-income population, Journal of Human Resources, 35, pp. 480-502, (2000)
  • [5] Barros F.C., Vaughan J.P., Victoria C.G., Huttly S.P.A., Epidemic of cesarean sections in Brazil, Lancet, 338, pp. 167-169, (1991)
  • [6] Bayard K., Hellerstein J., Neumark D., Troske K., New evidence on sex segregation and sex differences in wages from matched employee-employer data, Journal of Labor Economics, 21, pp. 887-922, (2003)
  • [7] Bertollini R., DiLallo D., Et al., Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: An analysis based on birth certificates, American Journal of Public Health, 82, pp. 257-261, (1992)
  • [8] Booth A., Babchuk N., Seeking health care from new resources, J Health Soc Behav, 13, pp. 90-99, (1972)
  • [9] Braverman P., Egerter S., Edmonston F., Verdon M., Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California, American Journal of Public Health, 85, pp. 25-630, (1995)
  • [10] Cai W., Marks J., Chen C., Zhaung Y., Morris L., Harris J., Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China, American Journal of Public Health, 88, pp. 777-780, (1998)