Stent thrombosis in the era of drug-eluting stents [Die stentthrombose im fokus von drug-eluting stents]

被引:0
作者
Wöhrle J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm
[2] Herzkathederlabore, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, 89081 Ulm
关键词
Drug-eluting stent; Myocardial infarction; Stent thrombosis;
D O I
10.1007/s00059-007-2891-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coronary stent thrombosis is frequently associated with death or myocardial infarction (MI). New definitions according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) were proposed to serve as standard criteria for stent thrombosis. According to these definitions, stent thrombosis was classified as acute (within 24 h post implantation), subacute (1-30 days), late (31 days to 1 year), and very late (later than 1 year). Furthermore, stent thrombosis was differentiated in definite with angiographic or autoptic verification, probable, and possible. In meta-analyses using the ARC criteria, the occurrence of subacute stent thrombosis did not differ between drug-eluting stents (DES; Cypher, Taxus) or bare-metal stents (BMS) with < 1%. Very late stent thrombosis occurred 0.4-0.6% more frequently with DES compared to BMS. Available follow-up periods are limited to 4 years. The occurrence of death and MI did not differ between DES and BMS within the total follow-up period. In the meta-analysis of the Taxus studies, the event rates (death and MI) were initially lower with DES compared to BMS based on the reduced need for target vessel revascularization. Nevertheless, this was compensated in the following period by a higher event rate due to very late stent thrombosis. In real-world registries, the event rates are higher than in the first randomized studies. With DES implantation as a routine strategy, the occurrence of angiographically documented stent thrombosis was 2.9% within a period of 3 years. Classic predictors for stent thrombosis with BMS remain relevant also in the DES era. The delayed endothelialization with DES in combination with suboptimally implanted DES takes the patients to a higher and longer risk for stent thrombosis. Several guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months after DES implantation in noncomplex lesions. In complex lesions combined antiplatelet treatment should be prescribed 24 months or longer (e.g., DES after brachytherapy). Patients scheduled for surgical procedures or patients with reduced compliance should not be treated with DES. © 2007 Urban & Vogel.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]  
Gurbel P.A., Bliden K.P., Samara W., Et al., Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: Results of the CREST Study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 46, pp. 1827-1832, (2005)
[12]  
Chen W.H., Lee P.Y., Ng W., Et al., Aspirin resistance is associated with a high incidence of myonecrosis after non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention despite clopidogrel pretreatment, J Am Coll Cardiol, 43, pp. 1122-1126, (2004)
[13]  
Lev E.I., Patel R.T., Maresh K.J., Et al., Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The role of dual drug resistance, J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, pp. 27-33, (2006)
[14]  
Kotani J., Awata M., Nanto S., Et al., Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: Angioscopic findings, J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, pp. 2108-2111, (2006)
[15]  
Joner M., Finn A.V., Farb A., Et al., Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: Delayed healing and late thrombotic risk, J Am Coll Cardiol, 48, pp. 193-202, (2006)
[16]  
Virmani R., DES Revolution, DES safety is suspect: Animal and autopsies don't lie, (2006)
[17]  
Virmani R., Guagliumi G., Farb A., Et al., Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: Should we be cautious?, Circulation, 109, pp. 701-705, (2004)
[18]  
Nebeker J.R., Virmani R., Bennett C.L., Et al., Hypersensitivity cases associated with drug-eluting coronary stents: A review of available cases from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project, J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, pp. 175-181, (2006)
[19]  
Finn A.V., Kolodgie F.D., Harnek J., Et al., Differential response of delayed healing and persistent inflammation at sites of overlapping sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents, Circulation, 112, pp. 270-278, (2005)
[20]  
Morice M.C., Bestehorn H.P., Carrie D., Et al., Direct stenting of de novo coronary stenoses with tacrolimus-eluting versus carbon-coated carbostents. The randomized JUPITER II trial, EuroIntervention, 2, pp. 45-52, (2006)