Dynamics of the water environment in a water quantity-quality-soil model of China’s Yellow River basin: imbalance and driving factors

被引:0
作者
Lihua Yang
Changxin Xu
Hongbing Zhu
Tianbo Fu
机构
[1] Hohai University,Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business
[2] Hohai University,Department of Finance, School of Business
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2023年 / 195卷
关键词
Water environment; Water quantity-quality-soil model; Spatial and temporal imbalances; Driving factors; Yellow River basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dynamic assessment of the water environment reflects variations in water resources in a basin under the combined influence of nature and humans and is a prerequisite for rational water management. This study provides an integrated assessment of the water environment in a water quantity-quality-soil model. Using the long-term monthly data from hydrological monitoring stations, the water environment of the Yellow River basin is assessed from the year 2006 to 2019. The kernel density estimation and the Dagum Gini coefficient are used to analyze the spatial and temporal imbalances of the water environment. Geographic detectors are used to extract external driving factors of the unbalanced evolution. The study results reveal that (1) the water environment in the basin shows a fluctuating downward trend, which mainly depends on the organic pollution control indicators, with a contribution of 22.85%. Scores of the water environment in the midstream are lower than those in the upstream and downstream due to the heavy pollutant discharges. (2) The spatial imbalance shows a fluctuating downward trend. Inter-regional variation is the primary source of regional variation in the water environment, with an average contribution of 56.02%. (3) The temporal imbalance of the water environment is on the rise, with a degree of multipolarity. The significant left trailing feature of the kernel density curve suggests that there are areas within the basin where the water environment is extremely poor. (4) For the overall basin and upstream, economic development and technological innovation are the main external driving factors influencing the spatial and temporal imbalances of the water environment. For the midstream and downstream, population density and environmental regulations are the main drivers. The interaction of any two factors has a greater impact than the single one.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [1] Abdi H(2010)Principal component analysis Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2 433-459
  • [2] Williams LJ(2011)A note on the relationship between top income shares and the Gini coefficient Economics Letters 110 274-277
  • [3] Alvaredo F(2004)Optional water development strategies for the Yellow River Basin: Balancing agricultural and ecological water demands Water Resources Research 40 1-11
  • [4] Cai X(2020)Monitoring inequality in water access: Challenges for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Science of the Total Environment 727 25-44
  • [5] Rosegrant MW(2021)Spatial variation, dynamic evolution and drivers of eco-efficiency in the Yellow River Basin Quantitative and Technical Economic Research 38 109-115
  • [6] Cetrulo TB(2020)A systematic approach of determining compensation and allocation for river basin water environment based on total pollutants control Journal of Environmental Management 271 242-252
  • [7] Marques RC(2020)Ecological protection of the lower reaches of the Yellow River under a high quality development strategy Science and Technology Herald 38 71-82
  • [8] Malheiros TF(2008)Measuring resource inequalities: The concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient Ecological Economics 65 74-85
  • [9] Cetrulo NM(2014)Water footprint scenarios for 2050: a global analysis Environment International 64 130-135
  • [10] Chen M(2019)Equilibrium cost of water environmental protection based on watershed sustainability Journal of Hydrology 579 710-718