Prospective Early Childhood and Elementary School Mathematics Teachers’ Concept Images and Concept Definitions of Triangles

被引:0
作者
Fadime Ulusoy
机构
[1] Mathematics and Science Education Department,Kastamonu University
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2021年 / 19卷
关键词
Concept image; Concept definition; Example; Non-example; Geometry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study presents a characterization of prospective early childhood teachers’ (ECEPTs) and prospective elementary school mathematics teachers’ (EMEPTs) concept images and concept definitions of triangles through a defining task and an example generation task. Data consisted of 62 EMEPTs’ and 72 ECEPTs’ written statements for the definition of a triangle, drawings for examples and non-examples of triangles, and written reasons for drawings. The results showed that most of the prospective teachers wrote inappropriate statements for the definitions of a triangle by using necessary but not sufficient conditions or using neither necessary nor sufficient conditions with frequent inaccurate terminology usage. The appropriate statements for the definition of a triangle included necessary and sufficient conditions, but were mostly considerably not minimal and/or included inappropriate mathematical terminology. A very large portion of the examples drawn by the prospective teachers consisted of acute triangles with typical positions rather than right and obtuse triangles, which can be evaluated as the indication of prototypical concept images. Drawings of non-triangles also revealed that the prospective teachers mostly drew non-triangular non-examples that can be immediately accepted as non-triangles with the lack of a relatively long list of missing critical attributes, but they provided a small number of triangular non-examples that bear significant similarity to valid examples of a triangle. This result indicates that the prospective teachers’ concept images regarding non-triangles also formed by intuitive non-examples which can be considered as prototypes for non-triangles.
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1078
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ball DL(2008)Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 389-407
[2]  
Thames MH(1986)Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17 31-48
[3]  
Phelps G(1999)Young children’s concepts of shape Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30 192-212
[4]  
Burger WF(1993)The theory of figural concepts Educational Studies in Mathematics 24 139-162
[5]  
Shaughnessy JM(1998)Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning International Journal of Science Education 20 1193-1211
[6]  
Clements DH(2011)Learning a mathematical concept from comparing examples: the importance of variation and prior knowledge European Journal of Psychology of Education 26 495-525
[7]  
Swaminathan S(1999)Preservice primary teachers' understanding of the concept of altitude of a triangle Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2 253-275
[8]  
Hannibal MAZ(1999)Young children’s developing understanding of geometric shapes Teaching Children Mathematics 5 353-358
[9]  
Sarama J(2014)A teacher’s conception of definition and use of examples when doing and teaching mathematics Mathematical Thinking and Learning 16 285-311
[10]  
Fischbein E(2000)Teacher knowledge and professional development in geometry Proceedings of the British society for research into learning mathematics 20 109-114