The role of sustainable corporate governance in mandatory sustainability reporting quality

被引:1
作者
Gerwing T. [1 ]
Kajüter P. [1 ]
Wirth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chair of International Accounting, University of Münster, Universitätsstraße 14-16, Münster
关键词
Corporate governance; Disclosure quality; Regulation; Sustainability reporting;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-022-01092-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzes the association between various sustainable corporate governance (SCG) mechanisms and mandatory sustainability reporting quality (MSRQ). To this end, we construct a novel MSRQ measure based on manually collected data from 220 German firms in their first year of mandatory sustainability reporting according to the European CSR Directive (2014/95/EU). Descriptive findings show a heterogeneous reporting quality for our sample. The regression analyses suggest an important role of SCG in ensuring high MSRQ. MSRQ increases with the number of SCG mechanisms employed. Regarding the individual mechanisms, we find that MSRQ is positively associated with a sustainable remuneration of the executive board, gender diversity at the supervisory board level, the existence of a CSR committee, engagement in CSR initiatives, and external assurance. However, we do not find any association between gender diversity at the executive board level and MSRQ, contradicting research on voluntary sustainability reporting. Finally, we derive several implications for preparers, auditors, stakeholders, and regulators. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 555
页数:38
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [11] Baraibar-Diez E., Odriozola M.D., Fernandez Sanchez J.L., Sustainable compensation policies and its effect on environmental, social, and governance scores, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, 26, pp. 1457-1472, (2019)
  • [12] Bear S., Rahman N., Post C., The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation, J Bus Ethics, 97, pp. 207-221, (2010)
  • [13] Berelson B., Content analysis in communication research, The Free Press, (1952)
  • [14] Berliner D., Prakash A., Bluewashing the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact, Pol Stud J, 43, pp. 115-138, (2014)
  • [15] Bernhagen P., Mitchell N.J., The private provision of public goods: corporate commitments and the United Nations Global Compact, Int Stud, 4, pp. 1175-1187, (2010)
  • [16] Berrone P., Gomez-Mejia L.R., Environmental performance and executive compensation: an integrated agency-institutional perspective, Acad Manag J, 52, pp. 103-126, (2009)
  • [17] Blackwell D.W., Noland T.R., Winters D.B., The value of auditor assurance: evidence from loan pricing, J Account Res, 36, pp. 57-70, (1998)
  • [18] Braam G., Peeters R., Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, 25, pp. 164-181, (2018)
  • [19] Carter D.A., Simkins B.J., Simpson G., Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value, Financ Rev, 38, pp. 33-53, (2003)
  • [20] Cetindamar D., Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: the case of the United Nations Global Compact, J Bus Ethics, 76, pp. 163-176, (2007)