The role of sustainable corporate governance in mandatory sustainability reporting quality

被引:1
作者
Gerwing T. [1 ]
Kajüter P. [1 ]
Wirth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chair of International Accounting, University of Münster, Universitätsstraße 14-16, Münster
关键词
Corporate governance; Disclosure quality; Regulation; Sustainability reporting;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-022-01092-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzes the association between various sustainable corporate governance (SCG) mechanisms and mandatory sustainability reporting quality (MSRQ). To this end, we construct a novel MSRQ measure based on manually collected data from 220 German firms in their first year of mandatory sustainability reporting according to the European CSR Directive (2014/95/EU). Descriptive findings show a heterogeneous reporting quality for our sample. The regression analyses suggest an important role of SCG in ensuring high MSRQ. MSRQ increases with the number of SCG mechanisms employed. Regarding the individual mechanisms, we find that MSRQ is positively associated with a sustainable remuneration of the executive board, gender diversity at the supervisory board level, the existence of a CSR committee, engagement in CSR initiatives, and external assurance. However, we do not find any association between gender diversity at the executive board level and MSRQ, contradicting research on voluntary sustainability reporting. Finally, we derive several implications for preparers, auditors, stakeholders, and regulators. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 555
页数:38
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [101] Michelon G., Parbonetti A., The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure, J Manag Gov, 16, pp. 477-509, (2012)
  • [102] Mittelbach-Hormanseder S., Hummel K., Rammerstorfer M., The information content of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Europe: an institutional perspective, Eur Account Rev, 30, pp. 309-348, (2021)
  • [103] Mio C., Venturelli A., Leopizzi R., Management by objectives and corporate social responsibility disclosure: first results from Italy, Account Audit Account, 28, pp. 325-364, (2015)
  • [104] Mori Junior R., Best P.J., Cotter J., Sustainability reporting and assurance: a historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon, J Bus Ethics, 120, pp. 1-11, (2014)
  • [105] Moroney R., Windsor C., Aw Y.T., Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis, Account Finance, 52, pp. 903-939, (2012)
  • [106] O'Dwyer B., User need in sustainability reporting: perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland, Eur Account Rev, 14, pp. 759-787, (2005)
  • [107] O'Dwyer B., Owen D., Unerman J., Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting, Account Org Soc, 36, pp. 31-52, (2011)
  • [108] Pany K., Smith C.H., Auditor Association with quarterly financial information: an empirical test, J Account Res, 20, pp. 472-481, (1982)
  • [109] Perez-Batres L., Miller V.V., Pisani M.J., Henriques I., Renau-Sepulveda J., Why do firms engage in national sustainability programs and transparent sustainability reporting?, Manag Int Rev, 52, pp. 107-136, (2012)
  • [110] Peters G.F., Romi A.M., The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports, Audit J Pract Theor, 34, pp. 163-198, (2015)