Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update

被引:0
|
作者
Christine E. Staatz
Susan E. Tett
机构
[1] The University of Queensland,School of Pharmacy
来源
Archives of Toxicology | 2014年 / 88卷
关键词
Mycophenolic acid; Mycophenolate; Pharmacology; Toxicology; Transplantation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This review aims to provide an update of the literature on the pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycophenolate is now the antimetabolite of choice in immunosuppressant regimens in transplant recipients. The active drug moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) is available as an ester pro-drug and an enteric-coated sodium salt. MPA is a competitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an important rate-limiting enzyme in purine synthesis. MPA suppresses T and B lymphocyte proliferation; it also decreases expression of glycoproteins and adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting monocytes and lymphocytes to sites of inflammation and graft rejection; and may destroy activated lymphocytes by induction of a necrotic signal. Improved long-term allograft survival has been demonstrated for MPA and may be due to inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 or fibroblast proliferation. Recent research also suggested a differential effect of mycophenolate on the regulatory T cell/helper T cell balance which could potentially encourage immune tolerance. Lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (renal sparing) appears to be possible with concomitant use of MPA in renal transplant recipients without undue risk of rejection. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. At least three studies have now reported that MPA exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with bioavailability decreasing significantly with increasing doses, perhaps due to saturable absorption processes or saturable enterohepatic recirculation. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still controversial and the ability of routine MPA TDM to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes is largely unknown. MPA monitoring may be more important in high-immunological recipients, those on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens and in whom unexpected rejection or infections have occurred. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA has been obtained in patients receiving MMF therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA area under the concentration time from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC0–12) is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection although AUC0–12 optimal cut-off values vary across study populations. IMPDH monitoring to identify individuals at increased risk of rejection shows some promise but is still in the experimental stage. A relationship between MPA exposure and adverse events was identified in some but not all studies. Genetic variants within genes involved in MPA metabolism (UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7), cellular transportation (SLCOB1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2) and targets (IMPDH) have been reported to effect MPA pharmacokinetics and/or response in some studies; however, larger studies across different ethnic groups that take into account genetic linkage and drug interactions that can alter a patient's phenotype are needed before any clinical recommendations based on patient genotype can be formulated. There is little data on the pharmacology and toxicology of MPA in older and paediatric transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1389
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of the pharmacology and toxicology of aucubin
    Zeng, Xiangchang
    Guo, Fei
    Ouyang, Dongsheng
    FITOTERAPIA, 2020, 140
  • [32] A review of the pharmacology and toxicology of Astragalus
    Rios, JL
    Waterman, PG
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 1997, 11 (06) : 411 - 418
  • [33] Transdermal fentanyl: Pharmacology and toxicology
    Nelson L.
    Schwaner R.
    Journal of Medical Toxicology, 2009, 5 (4) : 230 - 241
  • [34] Dosing algorithms for initiation of immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplant recipients
    Andrews, Louise M.
    Riva, Natalia
    de Winter, Brenda C.
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    de Wildt, Saskia N.
    Cransberg, Karlien
    van Gelder, Teun
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 11 (06) : 921 - 936
  • [35] Pregnancy Outcomes Related to Mycophenolate Exposure in Female Kidney Transplant Recipients
    King, R. W.
    Baca, M. J.
    Armenti, V. T.
    Kaplan, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (01) : 151 - 160
  • [36] Changing epidemiology of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and solid organ transplant recipients
    Renaud, Christian
    Campbell, Angela P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 24 (04) : 333 - 343
  • [37] Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Two Mycophenolate Mofetil Formulations in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Zhang, Jun
    Luo, YongGang
    Zhu, ZhenFeng
    Feng, GuiWen
    Sun, Zhi
    Zhang, XiaoJian
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2018, 40 (05) : 649 - 654
  • [38] Invasive yeast diseases in solid organ transplant recipients
    Munoz, Patricia
    Maria Aguado, Jose
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE MICOLOGIA, 2016, 33 (03): : 152 - 159
  • [39] INFECTIONS AND IMMUNIZATIONS IN ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS - A PREVENTIVE APPROACH
    AVERY, RK
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 61 (05) : 386 - 392
  • [40] Majocchi's granuloma in solid organ transplant recipients
    Romero, F. A.
    Deziel, P. J.
    Razonable, R. R.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2011, 13 (04) : 424 - 432