Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis

被引:0
作者
Şehim Kutlay
Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci
Atilla H. Elhan
Derya Öztuna
Nihal Koç
Alan Tennant
机构
[1] University of Ankara,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Ankara,Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine
[3] University of Leeds,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health
来源
Rheumatology International | 2011年 / 31卷
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Disability; Assessment; Rasch; Reliability; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study is to test the reliability and validity of WHODAS-II (Turkish version) for the assessment of disability in patients with osteoarthritis. This study is designed as follows: the internal construct validity of WHODAS-II in patients with knee osteoarthritis was assessed by Rasch analysis, and external construct validity by association with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP); reliability was tested by internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and test–retest ICC. Our study presents the results of 225 outpatients assessed with mean age 58.4 years (SD 11.1) of whom 80.9% were female. Cronbach’s α, ICC, and test–retest ICC values for the six subscales of WHODAS-II varied between 0.71 and 0.94, 0.71 and 0.94, and 0.87 and 0.97, respectively. Rasch analysis of WHODAS-II indicated that after adjustment for local dependency, satisfactory fit was achieved. Two separate ‘activities’ and ‘participation’ components could also be identified. External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with WOMAC and NHP. This study concludes that WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid health status instrument for measuring disability and components of ‘activities’ and ‘participation’ in patients with osteoarthritis. Thus, it provides the opportunity to model the consequences of disease according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 346
页数:7
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Reginster JY(2002)The prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis Rheumatol 41 3-6
[2]  
Botha-Scheepers S(2006)Activity limitations in the lower extremities in patients with osteoarthritis: the modifying effects of illness perceptions and mental health Osteoarthr Cartil 14 1104-1110
[3]  
Riyazi N(2003)Disability in depression and back pain. Evaluation of WHODAS-II in a primary care setting J Clin Epidemiol 56 507-514
[4]  
Kroon HM(2003)Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis Ann Rheum Dis 62 140-145
[5]  
Scharloo M(2009)WHODAS-II with people after stroke and their relatives Disabil Rehabil 31 855-864
[6]  
Houwing-Duistermaat JJ(2007)Psychometric properties of the WHODAS-II in rehabilitation patients Qual Life Res 16 1521-1531
[7]  
Slagboom E(2001)Yetiyitimi degerlendirme cizelgesinin (WHODAS-II) sizofreni hastalarında gecerlilik ve güvenilirligi Turk Psikiyatr Derg 12 121-130
[8]  
Chwastiak LA(2005)Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index Osteoarthr Cartil 13 28-33
[9]  
Von Korff M(2000)The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile Int J Rehabil Res 23 31-38
[10]  
van Tubergen A(1951)Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 16 297-334