A comparative study of antimicrobial, anti-quorum sensing, anti-biofilm, anti-swarming, and antioxidant activities in flower extracts of pecan (Carya illinoinensis) and chestnut (Castanea sativa)

被引:0
作者
Ülkü Zeynep Üreyen Esertaş
Yakup Kara
Ali Osman Kiliç
Sevgi Kolayli
机构
[1] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science
来源
Archives of Microbiology | 2022年 / 204卷
关键词
Antimicrobial; Biofilm; Quorum sensing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Antibiotic resistance, which has increased rapidly in recent years because of uncontrolled and unconscious antibiotic consumption, poses a major threat to public health. The inadequacy of existing antibiotics has increased the need for new, effective, and less toxic antibiotic raw materials or antibiotic derivatives. Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) and Chestnut (Castanea sativa) flowers possess abundant pollen contents and exhibit similar morphological features. The purpose of this study was to compare these two flower extracts in terms of their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid contents, and phenolic components were also analyzed in aquatic and ethanolic extracts. Antioxidant activities were measured using ferric reducing/antioxidant capacity (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods. Antimicrobial and antifungal activities were compared by means of agar diffusion tests against bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Mycobacteriumsmegmatis, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Chromobacterium violaceum, and the yeasts Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. Anti-quorum sensing (anti-QS), anti-biofilm, and anti-swarming (SW) activities were also studied against Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 31532, Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, respectively. Both extracts were rich in ellagic acid and gallic acid and exhibited similar antioxidant properties. Both flower extracts exhibited high antimicrobial and antifungal activities as well as anti-biofilm, anti-QS, and anti-SW activities.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 146 条
  • [1] Abdallah HM(2011)Antidiabetic activity of phenolic compounds from pecan bark in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats Phytochem Lett 4 337-341
  • [2] Salama MM(2008)Antioxidant activities of the extracts from chestnut flower, leaf, skins and fruit Food Chem 107 1106-1113
  • [3] Abd-Elrahman EH(2017)Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical characterization of Microb Pathog 104 190-195
  • [4] El-Maraghy SA(2015)An investigation of Turkish honeys: their physico-chemical properties, antioxidant capacities and phenolic profiles Food Chem 180 133-141
  • [5] Barreira JC(2016)Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of pecan nut [ Food Sci Technol 36 42-45
  • [6] Ferreira IC(2007) (Wangenh) C. Koch] shell aqueous extract on minimally processed lettuce leaves J Chem Eng Data 52 1552-1556
  • [7] Oliveira MBP(2020)Solubility of flavonoids in organic solvents J Apicul Res 59 160-169
  • [8] Pereira JA(2017)Comparative study of anti-biofilm, cytotoxic activity and chemical composition of algerian propolis Evid-Based Comp Alter Med 60 330-335
  • [9] Bottari NB(2009)Anti-biofilm and antioxidant activity of propolis and bud poplar resins versus Grasas Aceites 48 66-78
  • [10] Lopes LQS(2020)Antioxidant properties of pecan nut [ Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoc 16 1961-1981