Three-Dimensional Simulations of Subaerial Landslide-Generated Waves: Comparing OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D HYDRO Models

被引:0
作者
Ramtin Sabeti
Mohammad Heidarzadeh
Alessandro Romano
Gabriel Barajas Ojeda
Javier L. Lara
机构
[1] University of Bath,Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering
[2] Roma Tre University,Engineering Department
[3] IHCantabria-Instituto de Hidráulica Ambiental de la Universidad de Cantabria,undefined
来源
Pure and Applied Geophysics | 2024年 / 181卷
关键词
Tsunami; subaerial landslide; physical modelling; open FOAM; FLOW-3D HYDRO;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The recent destructive landslide tsunamis, such as the 2018 Anak Krakatau event, were fresh reminders for developing validated three-dimensional numerical tools to accurately model landslide tsunamis and to predict their hazards. In this study, we perform Three-dimensional physical modelling of waves generated by subaerial solid-block landslides, and use the data to validate two numerical models: the commercial software FLOW-3D HYDRO and the open-source OpenFOAM package. These models are key representatives of the primary types of modelling tools—commercial and open-source—utilized by scientists and engineers in the field. This research is among a few studies on 3D physical and numerical models for landslide-generated waves, and it is the first time that the aforementioned two models are systematically compared. We show that the two models accurately reproduce the physical experiments and give similar performances in modelling landslide-generated waves. However, they apply different approaches, mechanisms and calibrations to deliver the tasks. It is found that the results of the two models are deviated by approximately 10% from one another. This guide helps engineers and scientists implement, calibrate, and validate these models for landslide-generated waves. The validity of this research is confined to solid-block subaerial landslides and their impact in the near-field zone.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1093
页数:18
相关论文
共 178 条
[31]  
Aristodemo F(2005)A Boussinesq type extension of the GeoClaw model-a study of wave breaking phenomena applying dispersive long wave models Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 170 e2020JC016157-364
[32]  
Molfetta MG(2012)Validation and inter-comparison of models for landslide tsunami generation Coastal Engineering Proceedings 21 05021016-216
[33]  
Petrillo AF(2005)On the over-production of turbulence beneath surface waves in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes models Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 165 e2021JC017826-undefined
[34]  
Ersoy H(2021)Multi-phase flow simulation of impulsive waves generated by a sub-aerial granular landslide on an erodible slope Coastal Engineering 13 147-undefined
[35]  
Oğuz Sünnetci M(1996)Runup and rundown generated by three-dimensional sliding masses Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 81 127-undefined
[36]  
Karahan M(2021)A numerical study of the run-up generated by three-dimensional landslides Coastal Engineering 125 355-undefined
[37]  
Perinçek D(2022)A probabilistic approach for the waves generated by a submarine landslide Nature Communications 266 198-undefined
[38]  
Grilli ST(2013)Great landslide events in Italian artificial reservoirs Coastal Engineering 148 undefined-undefined
[39]  
Shelby M(2020)Landslide tsunamis: Comparison between depth-averaged and Navier–Stokes models Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 127 undefined-undefined
[40]  
Kimmoun O(2022)Simplified model of tsunami generation by submarine landslides Ocean Engineering 44 undefined-undefined