Can endometrial compaction predict live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

[1] Crosby DA(2022)Mid-luteal uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women undergoing assisted reproduction Hum Fertil (Camb). 25 670-676

[2] Glover LE(2020)Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 20 663-1888

[3] Downey P(2022)An endometrial receptivity scoring system basing on the endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow evaluated by ultrasonography Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13 907874-800

[4] Mooney EE(2018)The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers Hum Reprod. 33 1883-137

[5] McAuliffe FM(2022)Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers Fertil Steril. 117 792-987

[6] O'Farrelly C(2021)Endometrial thickness is not predictive for live birth after embryo transfer, even without a cutoff Fertil Steril. 116 130-1916

[7] Martins RS(2022)Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a prospective study Hum Reprod. 37 980-9.e1

[8] Oliani AH(2022)Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: a prospective cohort study J Assist Reprod Genet. 39 1909-263

[9] Oliani DV(2019)Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers Fertil Steril. 112 503-572

[10] de Oliveira JM(2001)Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 18 258-1463

[1] Crosby DA(2022)Mid-luteal uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women undergoing assisted reproduction Hum Fertil (Camb). 25 670-676

[2] Glover LE(2020)Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 20 663-1888

[3] Downey P(2022)An endometrial receptivity scoring system basing on the endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow evaluated by ultrasonography Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13 907874-800

[4] Mooney EE(2018)The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers Hum Reprod. 33 1883-137

[5] McAuliffe FM(2022)Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers Fertil Steril. 117 792-987

[6] O'Farrelly C(2021)Endometrial thickness is not predictive for live birth after embryo transfer, even without a cutoff Fertil Steril. 116 130-1916

[7] Martins RS(2022)Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a prospective study Hum Reprod. 37 980-9.e1

[8] Oliani AH(2022)Endometrial compaction is associated with increased clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in unstimulated natural cycle frozen embryo transfers: a prospective cohort study J Assist Reprod Genet. 39 1909-263

[9] Oliani DV(2019)Endometrial compaction (decreased thickness) in response to progesterone results in optimal pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfers Fertil Steril. 112 503-572

[10] de Oliveira JM(2001)Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 18 258-1463