Signs of taste for science: a methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom

被引:19
作者
Anderhag P. [1 ]
Wickman P.-O. [1 ]
Hamza K.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm
关键词
Aesthetics; Interest; Methodology; Norms; Science education; Situated learning; Taste; Values;
D O I
10.1007/s11422-014-9641-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we present a methodological approach for analyzing the transformation of interest in science through classroom talk and action. To this end, we use the construct of taste for science as a social and communicative operationalization, or proxy, to the more psychologically oriented construct of interest. To gain a taste for science as part of school science activities means developing habits of performing and valuing certain distinctions about ways to talk, act and be that are jointly construed as belonging in the school science classroom. In this view, to learn science is not only about learning the curriculum content, but also about learning a normative and aesthetic content in terms of habits of distinguishing and valuing. The approach thus complements previous studies on students’ interest in science, by making it possible to analyze how taste for science is constituted, moment-by-moment, through talk and action in the science classroom. In developing the method, we supplement theoretical constructs coming from pragmatism and Pierre Bourdieu with empirical data from a lower secondary science classroom. The application of the method to this classroom demonstrates the potential that the approach has for analyzing how conceptual, normative, and aesthetic distinctions within the science classroom interact in the constitution of taste for, and thereby potentially also in the development of interest in science among students. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 368
页数:29
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]  
Kuipers G., Good humor, bad taste: a sociology of the joke, (2006)
[32]  
Lave J., The practice of learning, Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context, pp. 3-32, (1996)
[33]  
Lemke J.L., Talking science: Language, learning and values, (1990)
[34]  
Lindahl B., Lust att lära naturvetenskap och teknik? En longitudinell studie om vägen till gymnasiet [Pupils’ responses to school science and technology? A longitudinal study of pathways to upper secondary school]. Diss, University of Gothenburg, (2003)
[35]  
Lyons T., Different countries, same science classes: Students experiences of school science in their own words, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 6, pp. 591-613, (2006)
[36]  
Osborne J., Simon S., Collins S., Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 9, pp. 1049-1079, (2003)
[37]  
Ostman L., Rethinking science teaching as a moral act, Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 14, pp. 141-150, (1994)
[38]  
Ostman L., How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse, Problems of meaning in science curriculum, pp. 54-70, (1998)
[39]  
Rorty R., Objectivity, relativism, and truth, (1991)
[40]  
Saljo R., Bergqvist K., Seeing the light: discourse and practice in the optics lab, Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, pp. 385-405, (1997)