Signs of taste for science: a methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom

被引:19
作者
Anderhag P. [1 ]
Wickman P.-O. [1 ]
Hamza K.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm
关键词
Aesthetics; Interest; Methodology; Norms; Science education; Situated learning; Taste; Values;
D O I
10.1007/s11422-014-9641-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we present a methodological approach for analyzing the transformation of interest in science through classroom talk and action. To this end, we use the construct of taste for science as a social and communicative operationalization, or proxy, to the more psychologically oriented construct of interest. To gain a taste for science as part of school science activities means developing habits of performing and valuing certain distinctions about ways to talk, act and be that are jointly construed as belonging in the school science classroom. In this view, to learn science is not only about learning the curriculum content, but also about learning a normative and aesthetic content in terms of habits of distinguishing and valuing. The approach thus complements previous studies on students’ interest in science, by making it possible to analyze how taste for science is constituted, moment-by-moment, through talk and action in the science classroom. In developing the method, we supplement theoretical constructs coming from pragmatism and Pierre Bourdieu with empirical data from a lower secondary science classroom. The application of the method to this classroom demonstrates the potential that the approach has for analyzing how conceptual, normative, and aesthetic distinctions within the science classroom interact in the constitution of taste for, and thereby potentially also in the development of interest in science among students. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 368
页数:29
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abrahams I., Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science, International Journal of Science Education, 31, 17, pp. 2335-2353, (2009)
[2]  
Adamuti-Trache M., Andres L., Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of Study: Cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 12, pp. 1557-1584, (2008)
[3]  
Aikenhead G.S., Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science, Studies in Science Education, 27, 1, (1996)
[4]  
Albright J., Luke A., Pierre Bourdieu and literacy education, New York, (2008)
[5]  
Anderhag P., Emanuelsson P., Wickman P.-O., Hamza K.M., Students’ Choice of Post-Compulsory Science: In search of schools that compensate for the socio-economic background of their students, International Journal of Science Education, 35, 18, pp. 3141-3160, (2013)
[6]  
Arvola-Orlander A., Wickman P.-O., Bodily experiences in secondary school biology, Cultural Studies in Science Education, 6, 3, pp. 569-594, (2011)
[7]  
Blalock C.L., Lichtenstein M.J., Owen S., Pruski L., Marshall C., Toepperwein M., In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2008, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 7, pp. 961-977, (2008)
[8]  
Boe M.V., Henriksen E.K., Lyons T., Schreiner C., Participation in science and technology: young people’s achievement-related choices in late modern societies, Studies in Science Education, 47, 1, pp. 37-72, (2011)
[9]  
Bourdieu P., Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, (1984)
[10]  
Bourdieu P., Practical reason: On the theory of action, (1998)