Use of complementary alternative medicine for low back pain consulting in general practice: A cohort study

被引:34
作者
Chenot J.-F. [1 ]
Becker A. [1 ,2 ]
Leonhardt C. [3 ]
Keller S. [3 ,4 ]
Donner-Banzhoff N. [2 ]
Baum E. [2 ]
Pfingsten M. [5 ]
Hildebrandt J. [5 ]
Basler H.-D. [3 ]
Kochen M.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dpt. of General Practice, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen
[2] Dpt. of General Practice, Preventive and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Marburg, 35033 Marburg
[3] Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg
[4] Dpt. of Public Health Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822
[5] Dpt. of Anaesthesiology, Pain Clinic, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen
来源
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine | / 7卷 / 1期
关键词
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Rehabilitation Facility; Spinal Manipulation; Specialist Consultation; Electric Muscle Stimulation;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6882-7-42
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although back pain is considered one of the most frequent reasons why patients seek complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies little is known on the extent patients are actually using CAM for back pain. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a longitudinal prospective cohort study embedded in a RCT. General practitioners (GPs) recruited consecutively adult patients presenting with LBP. Data on physical function, on subjective mood, and on utilization of health services was collected at the first consultation and at follow-up telephone interviews for a period of twelve months Results: A total of 691 (51%) respectively 928 (69%) out of 1,342 patients received one form of CAM depending on the definition. Local heat, massage, and spinal manipulation were the forms of CAM most commonly offered. Using CAM was associated with specialist care, chronic LBP and treatment in a rehabilitation facility. Receiving spinal manipulation, acupuncture or TENS was associated with consulting a GP providing these services. Apart from chronicity disease related factors like functional capacity or pain only showed weak or no association with receiving CAM. Conclusion: The frequent use of CAM for LBP demonstrates that CAM is popular in patients and doctors alike. The observed association with a treatment in a rehabilitation facility or with specialist consultations rather reflects professional preferences of the physicians than a clear medical indication. The observed dependence on providers and provider related services, as well as a significant proportion receiving CAM that did not meet the so far established selection criteria suggests some arbitrary use of CAM. © 2007 Chenot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Maretzki T.W., Seidler E., Biomedicine and naturopathic healing in West Germany. A historical and ethnomedical view of a stormy relationship, Cult Med Psychiatry, 9, 4, pp. 383-421, (1985)
[12]  
Chenot J.F., Becker A., Donner-Banzhoff N., Baum E., Hildebrandt J., Pfingsten M., Leonhardt C., Luckmann J., Keller S., Basler H.D., Keller S., Kochen M.M., Process and results of the implementation of a guideline in primary care, Schmerz, SUPPL. 19, (2005)
[13]  
Wetzel D., Himmel W., Heidenreich R., Hummers-Pradier E., Kochen M.M., Rogausch A., Sigle J., Boeckmann H., Kuehnel S., Niebling W., Scheidt-Nave C., Participation in a quality of care study and consequences for generalizability of general practice research, Fam Pract, 22, pp. 458-464, (2005)
[14]  
Kohlmann T., Raspe H., The Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache, Rehabilitation, 35, pp. 1-8, (1996)
[15]  
Roese I., Kohlmann T., Raspe H., Measuring functional capacity in backache patients in rehabilitation: A comparison of standardized questionnaires, Rehabilitation, 35, pp. 103-108, (1996)
[16]  
Von Korff M., Studying the natural history of back pain, Spine, 19, 18 SUPPL., (1994)
[17]  
Luijsterburg P.A., Verhagen A.P., Ostelo R.W., van den Hoogen H.J., Peul W.C., Avezaat C.J., Koes B.W., Conservative treatment in patients with an acute lumbosacral radicular syndrome: Design of a randomised clinical trial, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 5, (2004)
[18]  
Radloff L.S., The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population, Appl Psychol Measur, 3, pp. 385-401, (1977)
[19]  
Hautzinger M., Bailer M., General Depression-Scale: ADS, Weinheim Beltz Test, (1993)
[20]  
Allison P.D., Logistic Regression Using the SAS System - Theory and Application, (1999)