Best practice recommendations for the use of fully implanted telemetry devices in pinnipeds

被引:0
作者
Markus Horning
Martin Haulena
Pamela A. Tuomi
Jo-Ann E. Mellish
Caroline E. Goertz
Kathleen Woodie
Rachel K. Berngartt
Shawn Johnson
Courtney R. Shuert
Kristen A. Walker
John P. Skinner
Peter L. Boveng
机构
[1] Alaska SeaLife Center,Marine Mammal Institute
[2] Oregon State University,Department of Biosciences
[3] Vancouver Aquarium,Marine Mammal Laboratory
[4] Bridge Veterinary Services LLC,undefined
[5] The Marine Mammal Center,undefined
[6] Durham University,undefined
[7] University of British Columbia,undefined
[8] NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center,undefined
关键词
Biotelemetry; Implant; Subcutaneous; Intraperitoneal; Marine mammal; Surgery; Reduction; Refinement; Replacement;
D O I
10.1186/s40317-017-0128-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electronic telemetry devices have enabled many novel and important data collection and experimental opportunities for difficult to observe species. Externally attached devices have limited retention and may affect thermoregulation, energetics, social and reproductive behavior, visibility, predation risk and entanglement. Internally placed, surgically implanted devices can mitigate some of these effects and may open additional experimental opportunities. However, improper implementation can significantly affect animals and data. From a review of recent studies using fully implanted tags and studying their effects, we present 15 specific best practice recommendations for the use of such tags in pinnipeds. Recommendations address issues including device size, coating and sterilization, implantation surgery and effect assessment, within the framework of the Three R’s: Reduction, Refinement, Replacement. While developed for pinnipeds, these recommendations could apply to other aquatic mammals and vertebrates and to partially implanted or even external tags.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 312 条
[1]  
Cooke SJ(2004)Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology Trends Ecol Evol 19 334-343
[2]  
Hinch SG(2015)Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet Science 348 aaa2478-182
[3]  
Wikelski M(2007)Bio-logging science: logging and relaying physical and biological data using animal-attached tags Deep Sea Res II 54 177-240
[4]  
Andrews RD(2012)Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps Mar Ecol Prog Ser 457 221-422
[5]  
Kuchel LJ(2014)Trends in tagging of marine mammals: a review of marine mammal biologging studies Afr J Mar Sci 36 409-1544
[6]  
Wolcott TG(2015)Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world Science 348 1255642-1483
[7]  
Butler PJ(1995)Effects of time-depth recorders on maternal foraging and attendance behavior of Antarctic fur seals ( Can J Zool 73 1538-30
[8]  
Kays R(2009)) Anim Behav 78 1477-219
[9]  
Crofoot MC(2012)Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals Wildl Res 39 15-834
[10]  
Jetz W(2013)A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals J Fish Wildl Manag 4 211-871