The evolutionary role of affordances: ecological psychology, niche construction, and natural selection

被引:0
作者
Manuel Heras-Escribano
机构
[1] University of the Basque Country,Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science
[2] Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology,Embodied Cognitive Science Unit
来源
Biology & Philosophy | 2020年 / 35卷
关键词
Affordances; Evolution; Niche construction; Natural selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to examine the evolutionary role of affordances, that is, the possibilities for action available in our environments. There are two allegedly competing views for explaining the evolutionary role of affordances: the first is based on natural selection; the second is based on niche construction. According to the first, affordances are resources that exert selection pressure. The second view claims that affordances are ecological inheritances in the organism’s niche that are the product of a previous alteration of the environment. While there seems to be a mutually exclusive definition of affordances in each of these views, I argue in this paper that the views are not competing but, rather, complementary. In this sense, affordances play the role of either resources or ecological inheritances depending on the temporal stage of the evolutionary process. I make this argument by analyzing how natural selection and niche construction affect each other even when they function independently from each other. In this light, if these two evolutionary mechanisms exert their power in parallel but at two different stages in the evolutionary history of a given econiche, then there is room to claim that affordances can be understood as both resources and ecological inheritances. This dual aspect of affordances shows their evolutionary role.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Costall A(1995)Socializing affordances Theory Psychol 5 467-481
  • [2] Dewey J(1896)The reflex arc concept in psychology Psychol Rev 3 357-370
  • [3] Donohue K(2005)Niche construction through phonological plasticity: life history dynamics and ecological consequences NewPhytol 166 83-92
  • [4] Glotzbach PA(1982)Ecological and phenomenological contributions to the psychology of perception Noûs 16 108-121
  • [5] Heft H(2007)The social constitution of perceiver-environment reciprocity Ecol Psychol 19 85-105
  • [6] Heft H(2018)Biosemiotics, the extended synthesis, and ecological information: making sense of the organism-environment relation at the cognitive level Biosemiotics 11 245-262
  • [7] Heras-Escribano M(2018)Affordances and landscapes: overcoming the nature culture dichotomy through niche construction theory Front Psychol 8 2294-298
  • [8] de Jesus P(2005)Gene–environment interactions in human diseases Nat Rev Genet 6 287-395
  • [9] Heras-Escribano M(2008)Soft inheritance: challenging the modern synthesis Genet Mol Biol 31 389-139
  • [10] De Pinedo-García M(2002)On the apparent paradox of learning and realism Ecol Psychol 14 127-349