Multi-objective optimization design method of the high-speed train head

被引:0
作者
Meng-ge Yu
Ji-ye Zhang
Wei-hua Zhang
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong University,State Key Laboratory of Traction Power
来源
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A | 2013年 / 14卷
关键词
High-speed train; Multi-objective optimization; Parametric model; Aerodynamic drag; Load reduction factor; U271.91; O355; TP18;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the continuous improvement of the train speed, the dynamic environment of trains turns out to be aerodynamic domination. Solving the aerodynamic problems has become one of the key factors of the high-speed train head design. Given that the aerodynamic drag is a significant factor that restrains train speed and energy conservation, reducing the aerodynamic drag is thus an important consideration of the high-speed train head design. However, the reduction of the aerodynamic drag may increase other aerodynamic forces (moments), possibly deteriorating the operational safety of the train. The multi-objective optimization design method of the high-speed train head was proposed in this paper, and the aerodynamic drag and load reduction factor were set to be optimization objectives. The automatic multi-objective optimization design of the high-speed train head can be achieved by integrating a series of procedures into the multi-objective optimization algorithm, such as the establishment of 3D parametric model, the aerodynamic mesh generation, the calculation of the flow field around the train, and the vehicle system dynamics. The correlation between the optimization objectives and optimization variables was analyzed to obtain the most important optimization variables, and a further analysis of the nonlinear relationship between the key optimization variables and the optimization objectives was obtained. After optimization, the aerodynamic drag of optimized train was reduced by up to 4.15%, and the load reduction factor was reduced by up to 1.72%.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 641
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Aguilar Madeira JF(2005)Multiobjective optimization of structures topology by genetic algorithms Advances in Engineering Software 36 21-28
[2]  
Rodrigues H(1990)The aerodynamic drag of high speed train Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 34 273-290
[3]  
Pina H(2011)Direct multisearch for multiobjective optimization SIAM Journal on Optimization 21 1109-1140
[4]  
Brockie NJW(2012)Recent developments in derivative-free multiobjective optimization Computational Technology Reviews 5 1-30
[5]  
Baker CJ(2002)A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6 182-197
[6]  
Custódio AL(2010)LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 98 34-46
[7]  
Madeira JFA(2006)Study on optimization of panhead shape possessing low noise and stable aerodynamic characteristics Quarterly Report of RTRI 47 72-77
[8]  
Vaz AIF(2001)Countermeasures for reducing pressure variation due to train passage in open sections Quarterly Report of RTRI 42 77-82
[9]  
Vicente LN(2010)Optimal cross-sectional area distribution of a high-speed train nose to minimize the tunnel micro-pressure wave Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 42 965-976
[10]  
Custódio AL(2001)Nose shape optimization of high-speed train for minimization of tunnel sonic boom JSME International Journal Series C, Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing 44 890-899