Corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus

被引:0
作者
Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini
Norhani Mohidin
Fereshteh Abolbashari
Bariah Mohd-Ali
Chandramalar T. Santhirathelagan
机构
[1] Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,School of Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Sungai Buloh Hospital,undefined
来源
International Ophthalmology | 2013年 / 33卷
关键词
Pentacam; Keratoconus; Corneal thickness; Corneal volume;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus in Asian population with the aim of discriminating between normal and ectatic cornea. Eyes were placed into one of the following three groups: normal, subclinical, and mild–moderate keratoconus. Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging (Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) was performed for each participant to record thinnest corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, corneal volume (CV), peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) and percentage thickness increase (PTI) at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm. The data were exported to SPSS for statistical analysis. Subjects comprised 52 normal, 15 subclinical keratoconus, and 32 mild–moderate clinical keratoconus eyes. Our results indicated that corneal thickness (CT) distribution, PTI, and CV in normal eyes were significantly different compared with subclinical and clinical keratoconus (P < .05). Overall, subclinical group exhibited lower CT distribution and volume, and higher PTI in comparison with normal eyes. However, they showed higher CT distribution and volume, and lower PTI compared with keratoconus group. In addition, there was a smaller change in PCT and PTI from the thinnest point of the cornea to the periphery. The results of the present study indicate that CT parameters and CV were significantly different in normal versus subclinical group and in normal versus keratoconus group. These findings could help clinicians to better discriminate between normal and ectatic cornea.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 145
页数:6
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Rabinowitz YS(1998)Keratoconus Surv Ophthalmol 42 297-319
[2]  
Zadnik K(1996)Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study group Cornea 15 139-152
[3]  
Barr JT(1986)A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus Am J Ophthalmol 101 267-1335
[4]  
Gordon MO(2002)Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus Cornea 21 671-29
[5]  
Edrington TB(2005)Between eye asymmetry in keratoconus in an Indian population Clin Exp Optom 88 146-825
[6]  
Kennedy R(1995)Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995) 11 194-1124
[7]  
Bourne W(1999)KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus J Cataract Refract Surg 25 1327-6
[8]  
Dyer J(2005)Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK J Refract Surg 21 749-628
[9]  
Zadnik K(2003)Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients J Refract Surg 19 24-985
[10]  
Steger-May K(1991)Corneal topography of keratoconus Cornea 10 2-383