Economic impacts of climate change on water resources in the coterminous United States

被引:0
作者
James Henderson
Charles Rodgers
Russell Jones
Joel Smith
Kenneth Strzepek
Jeremy Martinich
机构
[1] Stratus Consulting Inc,Climate Change Division
[2] Asian Development Bank,undefined
[3] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
[4] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,undefined
来源
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2015年 / 20卷
关键词
Climate change; Impacts; Economic analysis; Mitigation policy; Water demand; Water resources; Adaptation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A national-scale simulation-optimization model was created to generate estimates of economic impacts associated with changes in water supply and demand as influenced by climate change. Water balances were modeled for the 99 assessment sub-regions, and are presented for 18 water resource regions in the United States. Benefit functions are developed for irrigated agriculture, municipal and domestic water use, commercial and industrial water use, and hydroelectric power generation. Environmental flows below minimal levels required for environmental needs are assessed a penalty. As a demonstration of concept for the model, future climate is projected using a climate model ensemble for two greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenarios: a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario in which no new GHG controls are implemented, and an exemplary mitigation policy (POL) scenario in which future GHG emissions are mitigated. Damages are projected to grow less during the 21st century under the POL scenario than the BAU scenario. The largest impacts from climate change are projected to be on non-consumptive uses (e.g., environmental flows and hydropower) and relatively lower-valued consumptive uses (e.g., agriculture), as water is reallocated during reduced water availability conditions to supply domestic, commercial, and industrial uses with higher marginal values. Lower GHG concentrations associated with a mitigation policy will result in a smaller rise in temperature and thus less extensive damage to some water resource uses. However, hydropower, environmental flow penalty, and agriculture were shown to be sensitive to the change in runoff as well.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 157
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ainsworth EA(2005)What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO New Phytol 165 351-372
[2]  
Long SP(1995) enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO Water Resour Bull 31 889-906
[3]  
Booker JF(2006)Hydrologic and economic impacts of drought under alternative policy responses J Hydrometeorol 7 1113-1125
[4]  
Burke EJ(2003)Modeling the recent evolution of global drought and projections for the twenty-first century with the Hadley Centre climate model J Water Res Plan Man 129 4-17
[5]  
Brown SJ(2012)Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9 4263-4304
[6]  
Christidis N(2009)Impacts of impervious cover, water withdrawals, and climate change on river flows in the Conterminous US Energy Econ 31 S107-S120
[7]  
Cai X(1997)2.6: limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO Water Resour Res 33 1369-1374
[8]  
McKinney DC(1999) equivalent in the 21st century J Am Water Resour Assoc 35 1563-1583
[9]  
Lasdon L(2008)Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis J Geophys Res 113 423-437
[10]  
Caldwell P(1993)Socioeconomic impacts of climate change on U.S. water supplies Acta Geophy Pol 41 S75-S90