Evaluating Two Evidence-Based Intervention Strategies to Promote CRC Screening Among Latino Adults in a Primary Care Setting

被引:0
作者
Sheila F. Castañeda
Balambal Bharti
Rebeca Aurora Espinoza-Giacinto
Valerie Sanchez
Shawne O’Connell
Fatima Muñoz
Sylvia Mercado
Marie Elena Meza
Wendy Rojas
Gregory A. Talavera
Samir Gupta
机构
[1] San Diego State University,South Bay Latino Research Center, Graduate School of Public Health
[2] University of California,Moores Cancer Center
[3] San Diego,undefined
[4] San Ysidro Health Center,undefined
[5] Inc.,undefined
来源
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities | 2018年 / 5卷
关键词
Latino health; Colorectal cancer screening; Community health center; Primary care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Regular use of colorectal cancer screening can reduce incidence and mortality, but participation rates remain low among low-income, Spanish-speaking Latino adults. We conducted two distinct pilot studies testing the implementation of evidence-based interventions to promote fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening among Latinos aged 50–75 years who were not up-to-date with CRC screening (n = 200) at a large Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in San Diego, CA. One pilot focused on an opportunistic clinic visit “in-reach” intervention including a 30-min session with a patient navigator, review of an educational “flip-chart,” and a take-home FIT kit with instructions. The second pilot was a system-level “outreach” intervention consisting of mailed materials (i.e., FIT kit, culturally and linguistically tailored instructions, and a pre-paid return envelope). Both received follow-up calls to promote screening completion and referrals for additional screening and treatment if needed. The primary outcome was FIT kit completion and return within 3 months assessed through electronic medical records. The in-reach pilot consisted of mostly insured (85%), women (82%), and Spanish-speaking (88%) patients. The outreach pilot consisted of mostly of Spanish-speaking (73%) women (64%), half of which were insured (50%). At a 3-month follow-up, screening completion was 76% for in-reach and 19% for outreach. These data demonstrate that evidence-based strategies to promote CRC screening can be implemented successfully within FQHCs, but implementation (particularly of mailed outreach) may require setting and population-specific optimization. Patient, provider, and healthcare system related implementation approaches and lessons learned from this study may be implemented in other primary care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 535
页数:5
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Zambrana RE(1999)Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup Prev Med 29 466-477
[2]  
Breen N(2005)Screening for breast cancer JAMA 293 1245-1256
[3]  
Fox SA(2005)Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level J Natl Cancer Inst 97 1035-1043
[4]  
Gutierrez-Mohamed ML(2007)Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in latinas: a critical review of recent literature Cancer Control 14 369-379
[5]  
Elmore JG(2010)Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Natl Cancer Inst 102 1023-1039
[6]  
Armstrong K(2009)Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms Ann Intern Med 151 738-747
[7]  
Lehman CD(1996)Use of screening mammography and clinical breast examinations among black, Hispanic, and white women Prev Med 25 118-125
[8]  
Fletcher SW(1996)Differing beliefs about breast cancer among Latinas and Anglo women West J Med 164 405-409
[9]  
Elmore JG(2011)Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women J Gen Intern Med 26 123-129
[10]  
Reisch LM(2013)Time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in Latina and non-Hispanic white women: the six cities study Spring 2 84-118