Methodological Validation of Quality of Life Questionnaire for Coal Mining Groups-Indian Scenario

被引:0
作者
Sayanti Sen
Goutam Sen
B. K. Tewary
机构
[1] Jadavpur University,School of Oceanographic Studies
[2] Central Institute of Mining & Fuel Research(CIMFR),undefined
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2012年 / 105卷
关键词
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs; Domains; Quality of life; Reliability; Socioeconomic indicators; Coal mining;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Maslow’s hierarchy-of-needs theory has been used to predict development of Quality of Life (QOL) in countries over time. In this paper an attempt has been taken to derive a methodological validation of quality of life questionnaire which have been prepared for the study area. The objective of the study is to standardize a questionnaire tool to assess the QoL of residents in a problem area in India. From a pre tested 16 parameter questionnaire tool factorial validity were established to extract three domains and were mapped in accordance to Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory. Out of these 16 parameters 13 were found relevant. Then a new tool was conceptualized with 13 pre selected parameters and other parameters were pooled from existing tool and reviews to form a 36 parameter tool. Factor analysis was done to extract the domains. Reliability of the tool was also tested to find the relation between the domains of QoL. Then the quality of life of the study area was interpreted to find the distribution of respondents among the categories of QoL. 70% of respondents reported to have average quality of life. The tool was found to be highly reliable and valid.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 386
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Bernhard J(2004)Health related quality of life: A changing construct? Quality of Life Research 13 1187-1197
[2]  
Lowy A(1997)Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains Quality of Life Research 6 301-309
[3]  
Mathys N(1996)The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos Social Indicators Research 38 303-328
[4]  
Herrmann R(1994)Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities Social Indicators Research 31 103-157
[5]  
Hürny C(2002)Suatainability amd quality of life indicators: Towards the integration of economic, social and environmental measures, indicators The Journal of Social Health 1 4-254
[6]  
Browne JP(1997)Measuring quality of life: A new practical survey instrument Social Work 42 244-271
[7]  
Cummins RA(1999)Testing Malow’s hierarchy of needs: National quality of life across time Social Indicators Research 46 249-96
[8]  
Diener E(2001)Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research Social Indicators Research 55 1-413
[9]  
Flynn P(2004)To weight or not to weight: the role of domain importance in quality of life measurement Social Indicators Research 68 163-258
[10]  
Berry D(1943)A theory of human motivation’ Psychological Review 50 370-1196