Predicting Freeway Incident Duration Using Machine Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Khaled Hamad
Mohamad Ali Khalil
Abdul Razak Alozi
机构
[1] University of Sharjah,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Systems Research Group, Research Institute of Sciences & Engineering
[2] University of Sharjah,Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Systems Research Group, Research Institute of Sciences & Engineering
[3] University of Sharjah,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
来源
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research | 2020年 / 18卷
关键词
Machine learning; Incident duration; Houston TranStar; Neural networks; Support vector machine; Gaussian process regression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traffic incident duration provides valuable information for traffic management officials and road users alike. Conventional mathematical models may not necessarily capture the complex interaction between the many variables affecting incident duration. This paper summarizes the application of five state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models for predicting traffic incident duration. More than 110,000 incident records with over 52 variables were retrieved from Houston TranStar data archive. The attempted ML techniques include: regression decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), ensemble tree (bagged and boosted), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and artificial neural networks (ANN). These methods are known to effectively handle extensive and complex datasets. Towards achieving the best modeling accuracy, the parameters of each of these models were fine-tuned. The results showed that the SVM and GPR models outperformed other techniques in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE) with the best model scoring an MAE of 14.34 min. On the other hand, the simple regression tree was the worst overall model with an MAE of 16.74 min. In terms of training time, a considerable difference was found between two groups of models: regression decision tree, ensemble tree, and ANN on one hand and SVM and GPR on the other. The former required shorter training time (less than one hour each) whereas the latter had training times ranging between 5 to 34 hours per model.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 380
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Liu, Qing
    Zhang, Miao
    He, Yifeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Zou, Jingui
    Yan, Yaqiong
    Guo, Yan
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [32] Predicting Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Supervised Machine Learning
    Sayed, Mohammed
    Riano, David
    Villar, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [33] Investigating factors that contribute to freeway crash severity using machine learning
    Nickkar A.
    Yazdizadeh A.
    Lee Y.-J.
    Advances in Transportation Studies, 2020, 52 : 131 - 142
  • [34] Workflow for predicting undersaturated oil viscosity using machine learning
    Fotias, Sofianos Panagiotis
    Gaganis, Vassilis
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 20
  • [35] Predicting Equatorial Ionospheric Convective Instability Using Machine Learning
    Garcia, D.
    Rojas, E. L.
    Hysell, D. L.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 21 (12):
  • [36] Predicting clinical trial duration via statistical and machine learning models
    Cho, Joonhyuk
    Xu, Qingyang
    Wong, Chi Heem
    Lo, Andrew W.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 45
  • [37] A comparative study of machine learning regression models for predicting construction duration
    Zhang, Shen
    Li, Xuechun
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 23 (06) : 1980 - 1996
  • [38] Predicting discharge using a low complexity machine learning model
    Zia, Huma
    Harris, Nick
    Merrett, Geoff
    Rivers, Mark
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2015, 118 : 350 - 360
  • [39] Predicting Breast Screening Attendance Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Baskaran, Vikraman
    Guergachi, Aziz
    Bali, Rajeev K.
    Naguib, Raouf N. G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 15 (02): : 251 - 259
  • [40] Predicting slope safety using an optimized machine learning model
    Khajehzadeh, Mohammad
    Keawsawasvong, Suraparb
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)