Accuracy of Reported Community Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder

被引:0
作者
Moran Hausman-Kedem
Barry E. Kosofsky
Gail Ross
Kaleb Yohay
Emily Forrest
Margaret H. Dennin
Reena Patel
Kristen Bennett
James P. Holahan
Mary J. Ward
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Hospital,Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College
[2] Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian Hospital,Division of Pediatric Neurology
[3] Tel Aviv University,Pediatric Neurology and Child Development Center, Dana
[4] Weill Cornell Medical College,Dwek Childrens’ Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine
[5] Clinical and Translational Science Center,Department of Neurology & Neuroscience
来源
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | 2018年 / 40卷
关键词
Autism; Autism spectrum disorder (ASD); Pervasive developmental delay not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS); Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare community diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) reported by parents to consensus diagnoses made using standardized tools plus clinical observation. 87 participants (85% male, average age 7.4 years), with reported community diagnosis of ASD were evaluated using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) (ADOS-2), Differential Ability Scale (DAS-II), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II). Detailed developmental and medical history was obtained from all participants. Diagnosis was based on clinical consensus of at least two expert clinicians, using test results, clinical observations, and parent report. 23% of participants with a reported community diagnosis of ASD were classified as non-spectrum based on our consensus diagnosis. ASD and non-spectrum participants did not differ on age at evaluation and age of first community diagnosis. Non-verbal IQ scores and Adaptive Behavior Composite scores were significantly higher in the non-spectrum group compared to the ASD group (104.5 ± 21.7 vs. 80.1 ± 21.6, p < .01; 71.1 ± 15 versus 79.5 ± 17.6, p < .05, respectively). Participants enrolled with community diagnosis of PDD-NOS were significantly more likely to be classified as non-spectrum on the study consensus diagnosis than Participants with Autism or Asperger (36% versus 9.5%, Odds Ratio = 5.4, p < .05). This study shows suboptimal agreement between community diagnoses of ASD and consensus diagnosis using standardized instruments. These findings are based on limited data, and should be further studied, taking into consideration the influence of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria on ASD prevalence.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:8
相关论文
共 225 条
[1]  
Akshoomoff N(2006)Use of the Mullen scales of early learning for the assessment of young children with autism spectrum disorders Child Neuropsychology 12 269-277
[2]  
Al-Qabandi M(2011)Early autism detection: are we ready for routine screening? Pediatrics 128 e211-e217
[3]  
Gorter JW(2007)Patterns of growth in verbal abilities among children with autism spectrum disorder Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 75 594-604
[4]  
Rosenbaum P(2000)A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age: a 6-year follow-up study Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39 694-702
[5]  
Anderson DK(2011)Recognising and diagnosing autism in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance BMJ 343 d6360-1174
[6]  
Lord C(2012)Screening young children for autism spectrum disorders in primary practice Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42 1165-1042
[7]  
Risi S(2008)Autism and diagnostic substitution: evidence from a study of adults with a history of developmental language disorder Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 50 341-20
[8]  
Baird G(2011)Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008 Pediatrics 127 1034-19
[9]  
Charman T(2009)Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2006 MMWR Surveillance Summaries 58 1-21
[10]  
Baron-Cohen S(2012)Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2008 MMWR Surveillance Summaries 61 1-100