Mentalities, classes and the four lines of conflict in the social-ecological transformation

被引:0
作者
Martin Fritz
Dennis Eversberg
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller University,BMBF Junior Research Group ‘Mentalities in Flux’ (Flumen), Institute of Sociology
来源
European Political Science | 2024年 / 23卷
关键词
Social-ecological transformation conflict; Mentalities; Classes; Relational sociology; Eco-social policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, we argue that current societal struggles about whether and how eco-social policy and politics should be implemented to tackle the interlinked challenges of climate change and inequality are an expression of the main societal conflict of our times: the social-ecological transformation conflict. We identify four lines of conflict in the social-ecological transformation and explore how they are related to classes and mentalities. In the theoretical part, we conceptualize classes in social space and mentalities through a Bourdieusian relational approach. We also discuss the location of the four lines of conflict in social space. In the empirical part, we analyze survey data from Germany. Firstly, we find eight mentalities among respondents reflecting their views on various eco-social topics. Secondly, we construct the social space with socio-economic variables for the economic and cultural capital of the respondents. Thirdly, we plot the mentalities in the social space. The results show that the cultural middle class is in favor of eco-social policy, while the upper class and the economic middle class prefer green growth and ecological modernization. The lower-class fractions are skeptical of any transformation because they distrust institutions and cannot bear the transformation costs.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 55
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Asara V(2015)Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability Sustainability Science 10 375-384
[2]  
Otero I(2022)The German social space and its homologies: national variation on a basic structure Current Sociology 8 1703-1711
[3]  
Demaria F(2017)Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations Wires Climate Change 69 26-52
[4]  
Corbera E(2010)Focus: (re)productivity: sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders Ecological Economics 25 14-25
[5]  
Atkinson W(2022)Liberation and limitation: Emancipatory politics, socio-ecological transformation and the grammar of the autocratic-authoritarian turn European Journal of Social Theory 7 2812-2831
[6]  
Schmitz A(1989)Social space and symbolic power Sociological Theory 6 285-307
[7]  
Baranzini A(2022)Geography of contestation: a study on the yellow vest movement and the rise of populism in France Journal of Regional Science 31 233-256
[8]  
van den Bergh JCJM(2014)Principal component analysis Analytical Methods 33 973-987
[9]  
Carattini S(2011)Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies Critical Social Policy 30 389-419
[10]  
Howarth RB(2022)Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019 Nature Sustainability 35 401-423