Keynesian or Non-keynesian Effects of Fiscal Policy Changes: the Case of Tunisia

被引:0
作者
Wissem Khanfir
机构
[1] Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax,
来源
Journal of the Knowledge Economy | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
Private consumption; Fiscal policy; Smooth transition regression model; Tunisia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study seeks to analyze the effects of fiscal policy on private consumption by applying the smooth transition regression model. The advantage of this model is that it allows for fiscal policy shocks to vary with the changes in the fiscal policy and helps us capture the nonlinear nature of the fiscal multipliers of government consumption and tax revenues. This paper evaluates the effect of fiscal policy in Tunisia using annual data about the 1975–2010 period. The main results show that households tend to behave in non-keynesian manner during large fiscal expansions and contractions.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 347
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Adam CS(2005)Fiscal deficit and growth in developing countries Journal of Public Economics 89 571-597
[2]  
Bevan DL(2010)Expansionary fiscal consolidations in Europe: new evidence Applied Economics Letters 17 105-109
[3]  
Afonso A(1998)Tales of fiscal adjustments Economic Policy 13 487-545
[4]  
Alesina A(1997)Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: composition and macroeconomic effects IMF Staff Papers 44 210-248
[5]  
Ardagna S(2002)Fiscal policy, profits, and investment The American Economic Review 92 571-589
[6]  
Alesina A(2004)Fiscal stabilizations: when do they work and why European Economic Review 48 1047-1074
[7]  
Perotti R(2013)Is discretionary fiscal policy effective? Evidences for Tunisia and Egypt Review of Economics & Finance 3 81-96
[8]  
Alesina A(1990)Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries: Comment NBER Macroeconomics Annual 5 111-116
[9]  
Ardagna S(1996)Quel est le coût des ajustements budgétaires Economie Internationale 68 7-30
[10]  
Perotti R(1990)Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries: comment NBER Macroeconomics Annual 5 117-122