Self-Reported Examination Cheating of Alumni and Enrolled Students: Evidence from Ghana

被引:8
作者
Mensah C. [1 ]
Azila-Gbettor E.M. [2 ]
Asimah V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Ho Technical University, P O Box 217, Ho
[2] Department of Management Studies, Ho Technical University, P O Box 217, Ho
关键词
Alumni; Enrolled students; Examination cheating; Ghana; Polytechnic;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-017-9286-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates differences in the prevalence of self-reported examination cheating behaviours and perception of peer cheating between enrolled students and graduates. A convenience sample of 344 respondents selected from a Ghanaian polytechnic completed self-administered questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test of independence and Mann Whitney test. “Permitting another student to copy your answers during an exam” was the topmost exam cheating method among students. Graduates were more likely than enrolled students to self-report higher examination cheating behaviours. Enrolled students were less likely than graduates to perceive higher levels of peer cheating. Future studies should consider using graduates in students’ cheating studies in order to validate the results of the study. This study extends the extant literature on academic dishonesty as it provides insight on self-reported cheating between students and graduates. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 102
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Ahmadi A., Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context, Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, pp. 151-170, (2012)
  • [2] Allen J., Fuller D., Luckett M., Academic integrity: behaviours, rates, and attitudes of business students toward cheating, Journal of Marketing Education, 20, pp. 41-52, (1998)
  • [3] Anderman E.M., Midgley C., Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, pp. 499-517, (2004)
  • [4] Beck L., Ajzen I., Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior, Journal of Research in Personality, 25, pp. 285-301, (1991)
  • [5] Bernardi R.A., Adamaitis K.L., Data contamination by social desirability response bias: an international study of students’ cheating behavior, Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 11, pp. 157-184, (2006)
  • [6] Bernardi R.A., Baca A.V., Landers K.S., Witek M.B., Methods of cheating and deterrents to classroom cheating: an international study, Ethics & Behaviour, 18, 4, pp. 373-391, (2008)
  • [7] Boyd D., Ethical determinants for Generations X and Y, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, pp. 465-469, (2010)
  • [8] Brimble M.A., Stevenson-Clarke P., Perceptions and prevalence of academic misconduct in Australian Universities, Australian Educational Researcher, 32, 3, pp. 19-44, (2005)
  • [9] Brown B.S., Choong P., A comparison of academic dishonesty among business students in a public and private Catholic university, Journal of Research on Christian Education, 12, 1, pp. 27-48, (2003)
  • [10] Carpenter D.D., Harding T.S., Finelli C.J., Montgomery S.M., Passow H.J., Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward cheating, Journal of Engineering Education, 95, pp. 181-194, (2006)