Practical effects of carbon emissions trading system on energy efficiency

被引:0
作者
Xue Li
Aochen Cao
Yuhan Zhang
Yuting Zhao
Lulu Chen
Pan Jiang
Liang Liu
机构
[1] Southwest University of Science and Technology,School of Economics and Management
[2] Southwest University of Science and Technology,School of Environment and Resources
[3] Central University of Finance and Economics,School of Economics
来源
Scientific Reports | / 14卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The carbon emissions trading system (CETS) is a helpful policy instrument for separating carbon emissions from economic expansion, and it significantly impacts energy efficiency (EE). This study uses 30 Chinese provinces from 2007 to 2020 as its research samples, and classifies energy efficiency into single-factor energy efficiency (SFE) and total-factor energy efficiency (TFE), using the difference-in-differences model to examine the effect and mechanism of the CETS on EE. As an additional tool to assess the efficacy of the CETS, the corresponding evolution of the rebound effect of energy-related carbon emissions (RECE) is also calculated. This study shows that the CETS can significantly improve EE in China's pilot provinces. The influence mechanism indicates that the effect of the CETS on EE is influenced by the level of government governance, green innovation, and industrial structure optimization. Further study finds that after the CETS was carried out, the RECE in pilot provinces was higher than that in non-pilot provinces, and 31.4% of carbon emissions reduced by EE improvement rebounded. Therefore, the CETS has yet to realize its full carbon reduction potential. The study offers specific policy proposals for the enhancement of China's CETS in light of the aforementioned findings.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 232 条
[21]  
Song M(2018)Assessing the impact of economic growth target constraints on environmental pollution: Does environmental decentralization matter? J. Cleaner Production 201 390-266
[22]  
Zheng H(2017)Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments Emerg. Markets Finance Trade 53 254-191
[23]  
Shen Z(2022)Empirical study of the Environmental Kuznets curve and Environmental Sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA Energy Policy 171 173-339
[24]  
Zhou Z(2020)Foreign direct investments and the environmental Kuznets Curve: New evidence from Chinese Provinces Econ. Model. 89 330-856
[25]  
Wang L(2020)Market supervision, innovation offsets and energy efficiency: Evidence from environmental pollution liability insurance in China Sci. Total Environ. 746 840-173
[26]  
Du K(2021)Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104 161-1182
[27]  
Shao S(2020)Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies Energy Policy 138 1173-108
[28]  
Zhang D(2022)Dy Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 96-449
[29]  
Li M(2020)BaCuO Energy Econ. 91 439-38
[30]  
Ji X(2022)/Ba Energy 239 23-212