Challenges in End-of-Life Decisions in the Intensive Care Unit: An Ethical Perspective

被引:0
作者
Hanne Irene Jensen
Jette Ammentorp
Helle Johannessen
Helle Ørding
机构
[1] Vejle Hospital,Department of Anaesthesiology
[2] Lillebaelt Hospital/IRS University of Southern Denmark,Health Services Research Unit
[3] University of Southern Denmark,Health, Human and Society, Institute of Health Research
来源
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | 2013年 / 10卷
关键词
Ethics; End-of-life; Collaboration; ICU; Interdisciplinarity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When making end-of-life decisions in intensive care units (ICUs), different staff groups have different roles in the decision-making process and may not always assess the situation in the same way. The aim of this study was to examine the challenges Danish nurses, intensivists, and primary physicians experience with end-of-life decisions in ICUs and how these challenges affect the decision-making process. Interviews with nurses, intensivists, and primary physicians were conducted, and data is discussed from an ethical perspective. All three groups found that the main challenges were associated with interdisciplinary collaboration and future perspectives for the patient. Most of these challenges were connected with ethical issues. The challenges included different assessments of treatment potential, changes and postponements of withholding and withdrawing therapy orders, how and when to identify patients’ wishes, and suffering caused by the treatment. To improve end-of-life decision-making in the ICU, these challenges need to be addressed by interdisciplinary teams.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Adhikari NK(2010)Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults The Lancet 376 1339-1346
[2]  
Fowler RA(2009)Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: The conflicus study American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 180 853-860
[3]  
Bhagwanjee S(2009)Nursing roles in end-of-life decision making in critical care settings Western Journal of Nursing Research 31 496-512
[4]  
Rubenfeld GD(2003)Surgeons, intensivists, and the covenant of care: Administrative models and values affecting care at the end of life Critical Care Medicine 31 1551-1557
[5]  
Azoulay E(1995)A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators The Journal of the American Medical Association 274 1591-1598
[6]  
Timsit JF(2006)Intensive care unit quality improvement: A “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team Critical Care Medicine 34 211-218
[7]  
Sprung CL(2010)Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit The Lancet 376 1347-1353
[8]  
Bach V(2002)Communication, collaboration, and teamwork among health care professionals Communication Research Trends 21 3-21
[9]  
Ploeg J(2004)Enough: The failure of the living will The Hastings Center Report 34 30-42
[10]  
Black M(2003)Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 167 1310-1315