Integrating the ecosystem service in sustainable plateau spatial planning: A case study of the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin

被引:0
作者
Lei Che
Liang Zhou
Jiangang Xu
机构
[1] Nanjing University,School of Architecture and Urban Planning
[2] Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Faculty of Geomatics
[3] CAS,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词
ecosystem service values; spatial planning; ecological protection; Yarlung Zangbo River Basin; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Yarlung Zangbo River Basin (YZRB) is a key ecological protection area on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). Determination of the ecosystem service values (ESVs) can help recognize the benefits of sustainable management. It is gradually becoming the main path that constructs plateau spatial planning of integrating ecological protection, and achieves global sustainable development goals (SDGs) in China. In this paper, the spatio-temporal dynamic evolutions of the ESVs were estimated on the multiple scales of “basin, subbasin and watershed” from 1980 to 2015. The main factors influencing ESVs were explored in terms of physical geography, human activities, and climate change. It had been proposed that sustainable spatial planning including ecological protection, basin management, and regional development was urgent to set up. Our results show that the increase in wetland and forest and results in an increase of 9.4% in the ESVs. Attention should be paid to the reduction of water and grassland. Water conservation (WC), waste treatment (WT), and soil formation and conservation (SFC) are the most important ecosystem services in the YZRB. At present, the primary problem is to solve the ESVs decreasing caused by glacier melting, grassland degradation, and desertification in the upper reaches region. The middle reaches should raise the level of supply services. Regulation services should be increased in the lower reaches region on the premise of protecting vegetation. The ESVs in adjacent watersheds are interrelated and the phenomenon of “high agglomeration and low agglomeration” is obvious, existing hot-spots and cold-spots of ESVs. Additionally, when the altitude is 4500–5500 m, the temperature is 3–8°C, and the annual precipitation is 350–650 mm, ESVs could reach its maximum. A framework of sustainable plateau spatial planning could provide references to delimit the ecological protection red line, key ecological function zone, and natural resource asset accounting on the QTP.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 297
页数:16
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [1] Ádám K(2019)Effect of land use change on ecosystem services in Lake Balaton Catchment Land Use Policy 80 430-438
  • [2] Loránd A N(2018)Developing China’s ecological redline policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning Nature Communications 9 3034-3048
  • [3] Boglárka B(2013)Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom Science 341 45-50
  • [4] Bai Y(2018)Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics Ecosystem Services 32 144-157
  • [5] Wong C P(2014)The impact of climate change and anthropogenic activities on alpine grassland over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 189/190 11-18
  • [6] Jiang P(2020)Land use trade-offs associated with protected areas in China: Current state, existing evaluation methods, and future application of ecosystem service valuation Science of The Total Environment 711 134688-38
  • [7] Bateman I J(2018)Understanding the integration of ecosystem services and natural capital in Scottish policy Environmental Science & Policy 88 32-260
  • [8] Termansen M(2020)Restoring the forest revives our culture: Ecosystem services and values for ecological restoration across the rural-urban nexus in South Africa Forest Policy and Economics 118 102222-158
  • [9] Bryan B A(1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 253-968
  • [10] Yang Y Q(2014)Changes in the global value of ecosystem services Global Environment Change 26 152-18