Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks?

被引:0
作者
Luis Jiménez
机构
[1] Universidad de Santiago,Facultad de Psicología, Campus Sur
来源
Psychological Research | 2008年 / 72卷
关键词
Sequence Learning; Test Block; Implicit Learning; Response Tendency; Relational Pattern;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When exposed to a regular sequence, people learn to exploit its predictable structure. There have been two major ways of thinking about learning under these conditions: either as the acquisition of general statistical information about the transition probabilities displayed by the sequence or as a process of memorizing and using separate chunks that can later become progressively composed with extended practice. Even though chunk learning has been adopted by some theories of skill acquisition as their main building block, the evidence for chunk formation is scarce in some areas, and is especially so in the continuous serial reaction-time (SRT) task, which has become a major research tool in the study of implicit learning. This article presents a reappraisal, replication and extension of an experiment that stands so far as one of the few alleged demonstrations of chunk learning in the SRT task (Koch and Hoffmann, Psychological Res., 63:22–35, 2000). It shows that the effects which were taken as evidence for chunk learning can indeed be obtained before any systematic training and thus surely reflect a preexistent tendency rather than a learned outcome. Further analyses of the effects after extended practice confirm that this tendency remains essentially unchanged over continuous training unlike what could be expected from a chunk-based account of sequence learning.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 396
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Christiansen M. H.(1998)Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: A connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes 13 221-268
[2]  
Allen J.(1994)Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 567-584
[3]  
Seidenberg M. S.(2006)Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 475-490
[4]  
Frensch P. A.(2000)Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research 63 22-35
[5]  
Buchner A.(2006)Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science 17 346-350
[6]  
Lin J.(1987)Attentional requirementes of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology 19 1-32
[7]  
Jiménez L.(2005)Statistical approaches to language acquisition and the self-organizing consciousness: A reversal of perspective. Psychological Research 69 316-329
[8]  
Vaquero J. M. M.(1998)PARSER: A model for word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language 39 246-263
[9]  
Lupiáñez J.(2002)The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 297-388
[10]  
Koch I.(2006)Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 233-238