Development and refinement of a complex intervention within cardiac rehabilitation services: Experiences from the CADENCE feasibility study

被引:7
作者
Winder R. [1 ]
Richards S.H. [1 ]
Campbell J.L. [1 ]
Richards D.A. [1 ]
Dickens C. [1 ]
Gandhi M. [2 ]
Wright C. [1 ]
Turner K. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] University of Exeter Medical School Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Exeter
[2] Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter
[3] University of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol
[4] The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research, Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Behavioural activation; Care coordination; Complex intervention; Depression; Enhanced psychological care; Intervention development; Qualitative research; Rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-017-0123-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients who experience a cardiac event are at higher risk of developing depression than the general population. Despite this, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes do not provide a systematic approach to psychological care for depression. The CADENCE study aimed to develop and pilot an enhanced psychological care (EPC) intervention consisting of behavioural activation (BA) and mental health care coordination. Following original research commissioning guidance, the intervention was planned to be embedded in routine care and delivered by CR nurses to patients with depression attending CR. This paper describes how qualitative methods were used to develop, embed and refine the intervention. Methods: This feasibility study involved three CR teams. Observations were made of CR nurses delivering usual care, of EPC training given to nurses, and of supervision sessions provided to the CR nurses. Four nurses were interviewed shortly after their EPC training, and three were interviewed again 6-7 months later having delivered EPC to patients. All nine patients recruited to receive EPC were interviewed. Analyses of the observation notes and interview transcripts focused on how the intervention could be improved in terms of its acceptability and implementation. Results: Variations were found between the CR teams regarding patient waiting list times, how CR was delivered, what facilities were available and how many CR sessions were offered to patients. EPC was acceptable to both nurses and patients. However, nurses struggled to provide this additional care within their existing workload and resources, and patients' disrupted progression through the CR programme affected EPC delivery. Limited time and availability of private space meant nurses also delivered EPC by telephone, which was viewed as a pragmatic solution but less preferable than face-to-face. Nurses indicated that patients struggled with some of the written materials. Findings were used to revise the intervention to become a protocol of care coordination which included guided self-help BA. Conclusions: Insights gained through conducting interviews and observations enabled us to identify barriers to the implementation of EPC, and to modify the intervention to facilitate its delivery within existing services whilst remaining acceptable to both nurses and patients. The multiple method, iterative approach used was key to the success of this qualitative study. © 2017 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
National audit of cardiac rehabilitation: annual statistical report, (2015)
[2]  
Singleton N., Bumpstead R., O'Brien M., Et al., Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000, Int Rev Psychiatry, 15, 1-2, pp. 65-73, (2003)
[3]  
The BACPR standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation, (2012)
[4]  
Timmis A., Acute coronary syndromes, Br Med J, 351, (2015)
[5]  
HTA - 12/189/06: A feasibility study and pilot RCT to establish methods for assessing the acceptability, and clinical and cost-effectiveness of enhanced psychological care (EPC) in cardiac rehabilitation services for patients with new onset depression compared with treatment as usual: CADENCE [Web page], (2016)
[6]  
Jacobson N.S., Martell C.R., Dimidjian S., Behavioral activation treatment for depression: returning to contextual roots, Clin Psychol Sci Pract, 8, 3, pp. 255-270, (2001)
[7]  
Richards D., Lovell K., Gilbody S., Et al., Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomized controlled trial, Psychol Med, 38, 2, pp. 279-287, (2008)
[8]  
Richards D.A., Hill J.J., Gask L., Et al., Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): cluster randomised controlled trial, Br Med J., 347, (2013)
[9]  
Ekers D., Richards D., McMillan D., Et al., Behavioural activation delivered by the non-specialist: phase II randomised controlled trial, Br J Psychiatry, 198, 1, pp. 66-72, (2011)
[10]  
Ekers D., Murphy R., Archer J., Et al., Nurse-delivered collaborative care for depression and long-term physical conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Affect Disord, 149, pp. 14-22, (2013)