The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain

被引:0
作者
D. M. McClung
Peter Hӧller
J. T. Fischer
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Department of Geography
[2] Natural Hazards and Landscape BFW Institute for Natural Hazards,Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 112卷
关键词
Return period; Snow avalanche; Land-use planning; Empirical method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 806
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Land-use planning in the Chaco plain (Burruyacu, Argentina): Part 2: Generating a consensus plan to mitigate land-use conflicts and minimize land degradation [J].
Recatala Boix, Luis ;
Alfred Zinck, Joseph .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (02) :200-209
[42]   Customary land tenure practices in Ghana: examining the relationship with land-use planning delivery [J].
Yeboah, Eric ;
Shaw, David P. .
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2013, 35 (01) :21-39
[43]   Land-conservation strategies: the dynamic relationship between acquisition and land-use planning [J].
Gerber, Jean-David ;
Rissman, Adena R. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2012, 44 (08) :1836-1855
[44]   A model of conflict resolution in public participation GIS for land-use planning [J].
Zhang, Yongjun ;
Fung, Tung .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2013, 40 (03) :550-568
[45]   Policy packaging for land-use and transport planning: the state-of-the-art [J].
Buser, Maaike A. ;
Ramezani, Samira ;
Stead, Dominic ;
Arts, Jos .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2025, 45 (03) :333-365
[46]   Perceived constraints to public participation in contemporary Nigerian land-use planning [J].
Badiora, Adewumi, I ;
Ojo, Deborah B. .
TOWN AND REGIONAL PLANNING, 2021, 78 :16-33
[47]   Standard methods for land-use planning to determine the effects on societal risk [J].
Laheij, GMH ;
Post, JG ;
Ale, BJM .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :269-282
[48]   METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL TO DEFINE MANAGEMENT UNITS FOR RURAL LAND-USE PLANNING [J].
Giselle Sales, Romina .
REVISTA INVI, 2020, 35 (98) :126-154
[49]   A Computational Geospatial Approach to Assessing Land-Use Compatibility in Urban Planning [J].
Mansourihanis, Omid ;
Tilaki, Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi ;
Yousefian, Samira ;
Zaroujtaghi, Ayda .
LAND, 2023, 12 (11)
[50]   Effects of local land-use planning on development and disturbance in riparian areas [J].
Dempsey, Judith A. ;
Plantinga, Andrew J. ;
Kline, Jeffrey D. ;
Lawler, Joshua J. ;
Martinuzzi, Sebastian ;
Radeloff, Volker C. ;
Bigelow, Daniel P. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 60 :16-25