The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain

被引:0
作者
D. M. McClung
Peter Hӧller
J. T. Fischer
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Department of Geography
[2] Natural Hazards and Landscape BFW Institute for Natural Hazards,Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 112卷
关键词
Return period; Snow avalanche; Land-use planning; Empirical method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 806
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Territorialising Sustainable Development: The Politics of Land-use Planning in Laos [J].
Lestrelin, Guillaume ;
Castella, Jean-Christophe ;
Bourgoin, Jeremy .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ASIA, 2012, 42 (04) :581-602
[32]   The control of major accident hazards: The land-use planning issue [J].
Christou, MD ;
Amendola, A ;
Smeder, M .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1999, 65 (1-2) :151-178
[33]   The urban public and forest land-use planning: Tapping into the majority [J].
Kidd, Scott ;
Sinclair, A. John .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2007, 83 (02) :221-230
[34]   A spatially explicit backcasting approach for sustainable land-use planning [J].
Haslauer, Eva ;
Biberacher, Markus ;
Blaschke, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (05) :866-890
[35]   A review of the necessity of a multi-layer land-use planning [J].
Hashem Dadashpoor ;
Leyla Ghasempour .
Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2024, 20 :111-127
[36]   Land-Use Planning, Digital Technologies, and Environmental Conservation in Tanzania [J].
Huggins, Chris .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 27 (02) :210-235
[37]   ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN LAND-USE PLANNING [J].
Dolezalova, Helena .
AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2011, 1 (01) :26-29
[38]   Land-Use Planning and the Public: Is There an Optimal Degree of Civic Participation? [J].
Kopacek, Miroslav .
LAND, 2021, 10 (01) :1-15
[39]   Land-Use Planning in the Chaco Plain (Burruyacú, Argentina): Part 2: Generating a Consensus Plan to Mitigate Land-Use Conflicts and Minimize Land Degradation [J].
Luis Recatalá Boix ;
Joseph Alfred Zinck .
Environmental Management, 2008, 42
[40]   Land-use planning in the Chaco plain (Burruyacu, Argentina): Part 2: Generating a consensus plan to mitigate land-use conflicts and minimize land degradation [J].
Recatala Boix, Luis ;
Alfred Zinck, Joseph .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (02) :200-209