The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain

被引:0
作者
D. M. McClung
Peter Hӧller
J. T. Fischer
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Department of Geography
[2] Natural Hazards and Landscape BFW Institute for Natural Hazards,Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 112卷
关键词
Return period; Snow avalanche; Land-use planning; Empirical method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 806
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Land-use planning in China: Past, present, and future [J].
Chen Wanxu ;
Pan Sipei ;
Ye Xinyue .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (07) :1527-1552
[22]   Introduction of threat analysis into the land-use planning process [J].
Kontic, Davor ;
Kontic, Branko .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 163 (2-3) :683-700
[23]   Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation [J].
Pierce, SM ;
Cowling, RM ;
Knight, AT ;
Lombard, AT ;
Rouget, M ;
Wolf, T .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 125 (04) :441-458
[24]   Land-use planning in China: Past, present, and future [J].
Wanxu Chen ;
Sipei Pan ;
Xinyue Ye .
Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2023, 33 (7) :1527-1552
[25]   Database Projection and Map Editing of Land-use Planning [J].
Xiao Qiuping ;
Fu Meichen ;
Wang Xiying ;
Xu Zhihua .
EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, :5485-+
[26]   Need for Land-Use Forecasting Improvements in Integrated Transportation-Land Use Planning [J].
Anjomani, Ardeshir .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON URBAN PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION, 2009, :153-158
[27]   Influence mechanism of local terrain features on snow avalanche dynamics [J].
Ge, MengLin ;
Li, XingYue ;
Huang, Yu ;
Gaume, Johan .
Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2025, 55 (06) :1043-1054
[28]   Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning [J].
Mahiny, Abdolrassoul Salman ;
Clarke, Keith C. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2012, 39 (05) :925-944
[29]   A review of the necessity of a multi-layer land-use planning [J].
Dadashpoor, Hashem ;
Ghasempour, Leyla .
LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 20 (02) :111-127
[30]   Leadership roles in local land-use planning for noise control [J].
Lamker, Christian .
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2019, 90 (03) :275-297