Mammographic density—a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer

被引:0
作者
C. W. Huo
G. L. Chew
K. L. Britt
W. V. Ingman
M. A. Henderson
J. L. Hopper
E. W. Thompson
机构
[1] University of Melbourne,Department of Surgery
[2] Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre,School of Medicine
[3] University of Adelaide,Centre for M.E.G.A.
[4] The University of Melbourne,School of Public Health
[5] Seoul National University,undefined
[6] St Vincent’s Institute,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2014年 / 144卷
关键词
Mammographic density; Breast cancer risk; Stroma; Adipose tissue; Tamoxifen; Biochamber; Extracellular matrix; Breast cancer screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There has been considerable recent interest in the genetic, biological and epidemiological basis of mammographic density (MD), and the search for causative links between MD and breast cancer (BC) risk. This report will critically review the current literature on MD and summarize the current evidence for its association with BC. Keywords ‘mammographic dens*’, ‘dense mammary tissue’ or ‘percent dens*’ were used to search the existing literature in English on PubMed and Medline. All reports were critically analyzed. The data were assigned to one of the following aspects of MD: general association with BC, its relationship with the breast hormonal milieu, the cellular basis of MD, the generic variations of MD, and its significance in the clinical setting. MD adjusted for age, and BMI is associated with increased risk of BC diagnosis, advanced tumour stage at diagnosis and increased risk of both local recurrence and second primary cancers. The MD measures that predict BC risk have high heritability, and to date several genetic markers associated with BC risk have been found to also be associated with these MD risk predictors. Change in MD could be a predictor of the extent of chemoprevention with tamoxifen. Although the biological and genetic pathways that determine and perhaps modulate MD remain largely unresolved, significant inroads are being made into the understanding of MD, which may lead to benefits in clinical screening, assessment and treatment strategies. This review provides a timely update on the current understanding of MD’s association with BC risk.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 502
页数:23
相关论文
共 1691 条
[71]  
Weissfeld JL(2004)Experimental manipulation of radiographic density in mouse mammary gland Breast Cancer Res 6 R540-1093
[72]  
Habel LA(2012)High and low mammographic density human breast tissues maintain histological differential in murine tissue engineering chambers Breast Cancer Res Treat 135 177-463
[73]  
Sternfeld B(1987)Mammographic patterns in twin pairs discordant for breast cancer Brit J Radiol 60 459-1458
[74]  
Cauley JA(1997)Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect J Natl Cancer Inst 89 549-1166
[75]  
Heng D(2002)Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 886-187
[76]  
Gao F(2006)The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 612-3305
[77]  
Jong R(2007)Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci Nature 447 1087-4982
[78]  
Fishell E(2010)Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19 456-364
[79]  
Yaffe M(2010)Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer and mammographic density measures that predict disease Cancer Res 70 1449-1482
[80]  
Martin L(2012)Common breast cancer susceptibility variants in LSP1 and RAD51L1 are associated with mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21 1156-1037