Mammographic density—a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer

被引:0
作者
C. W. Huo
G. L. Chew
K. L. Britt
W. V. Ingman
M. A. Henderson
J. L. Hopper
E. W. Thompson
机构
[1] University of Melbourne,Department of Surgery
[2] Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre,School of Medicine
[3] University of Adelaide,Centre for M.E.G.A.
[4] The University of Melbourne,School of Public Health
[5] Seoul National University,undefined
[6] St Vincent’s Institute,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2014年 / 144卷
关键词
Mammographic density; Breast cancer risk; Stroma; Adipose tissue; Tamoxifen; Biochamber; Extracellular matrix; Breast cancer screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There has been considerable recent interest in the genetic, biological and epidemiological basis of mammographic density (MD), and the search for causative links between MD and breast cancer (BC) risk. This report will critically review the current literature on MD and summarize the current evidence for its association with BC. Keywords ‘mammographic dens*’, ‘dense mammary tissue’ or ‘percent dens*’ were used to search the existing literature in English on PubMed and Medline. All reports were critically analyzed. The data were assigned to one of the following aspects of MD: general association with BC, its relationship with the breast hormonal milieu, the cellular basis of MD, the generic variations of MD, and its significance in the clinical setting. MD adjusted for age, and BMI is associated with increased risk of BC diagnosis, advanced tumour stage at diagnosis and increased risk of both local recurrence and second primary cancers. The MD measures that predict BC risk have high heritability, and to date several genetic markers associated with BC risk have been found to also be associated with these MD risk predictors. Change in MD could be a predictor of the extent of chemoprevention with tamoxifen. Although the biological and genetic pathways that determine and perhaps modulate MD remain largely unresolved, significant inroads are being made into the understanding of MD, which may lead to benefits in clinical screening, assessment and treatment strategies. This review provides a timely update on the current understanding of MD’s association with BC risk.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 502
页数:23
相关论文
共 1691 条
[1]  
Boyd NF(2007)Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 227-236
[2]  
Guo H(2006)Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 1159-1169
[3]  
Martin LJ(1976)Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern Cancer 37 2486-2492
[4]  
Sun L(1987)Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study AJR Am J Roentgenol 148 1087-1092
[5]  
Stone J(2011)Mammographic image segmentation and risk classification based on mammographic parenchymal patterns and geometric moments Biomed Signal Process Control 6 321-329
[6]  
Fishell E(2014)Methods for assessing and representing mammographic density: an analysis of 4 case-control studies Am J Epidemiol 179 236-244
[7]  
Jong RA(2013)Associations of mammographic dense, non-dense area and body mass index with risk of breast cancer Am J Epidemiol 179 475-483
[8]  
Hislop G(2013)Cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22 2395-2403
[9]  
Chiarelli A(2006)Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 2086-2092
[10]  
Minkin S(2005)Measurements of breast density: no ratio for a ratio Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14 2634-2640