Intrinsically Disordered Energy Landscapes

被引:0
|
作者
Yassmine Chebaro
Andrew J. Ballard
Debayan Chakraborty
David J. Wales
机构
[1] University of Cambridge,Department of Chemistry
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Analysis of an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) reveals an underlying multifunnel structure for the energy landscape. We suggest that such ‘intrinsically disordered’ landscapes, with a number of very different competing low-energy structures, are likely to characterise IDPs and provide a useful way to address their properties. In particular, IDPs are present in many cellular protein interaction networks and several questions arise regarding how they bind to partners. Are conformations resembling the bound structure selected for binding, or does further folding occur on binding the partner in a induced-fit fashion? We focus on the p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) protein, which adopts an [inline-graphic not available: see fulltext]-helical conformation when bound to its partner and is involved in the activation of apoptosis. Recent experimental evidence shows that folding is not necessary for binding and supports an induced-fit mechanism. Using a variety of computational approaches we deduce the molecular mechanism behind the instability of the PUMA peptide as a helix in isolation. We find significant barriers between partially folded states and the helix. Our results show that the favoured conformations are molten-globule like, stabilised by charged and hydrophobic contacts, with structures resembling the bound state relatively unpopulated in equilibrium.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Elasticity of Intrinsically Disordered Nebulin Modules
    Forbes, Jeffrey G.
    Wittebort, Richard J.
    Grishaev, Alexander
    Tsai, Wanxia L.
    Wang, Kuan
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 100 (03) : 61 - 61
  • [42] Dynamics and interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins
    Arai, Munehito
    Suetaka, Shunji
    Ooka, Koji
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 84
  • [43] Design of functional intrinsically disordered proteins
    Garg, Ankush
    Gonzalez-Foutel, Nicolas S.
    Gielnik, Maciej B.
    Kjaergaard, Magnus
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION, 2024, 37
  • [44] Making Sense of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
    Dyson, H. Jane
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (05) : 1013 - 1016
  • [45] Structural biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins
    Showalter, Scott
    Gibbs, Eric
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [46] Intrinsically disordered proteins related to epigenomics
    Nishimura, Yoshifumi
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2014, 89 (06) : 293 - 293
  • [47] Intrinsically disordered proteins: administration not executive
    Williamson, Mike P.
    Potts, Jennifer R.
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2012, 40 : 945 - 949
  • [48] Intrinsically disordered proteins and multicellular organisms
    Dunker, A. Keith
    Bondos, Sarah E.
    Huang, Fei
    Oldfield, Christopher J.
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 37 : 44 - 55
  • [49] Classification of Intrinsically Disordered Regions and Proteins
    van der Lee, Robin
    Buljan, Marija
    Lang, Benjamin
    Weatheritt, Robert J.
    Daughdrill, Gary W.
    Dunker, A. Keith
    Fuxreiter, Monika
    Gough, Julian
    Gsponer, Joerg
    Jones, David T.
    Kim, Philip M.
    Kriwacki, Richard W.
    Oldfield, Christopher J.
    Pappu, Rohit V.
    Tompa, Peter
    Uversky, Vladimir N.
    Wright, Peter E.
    Babu, M. Madan
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 114 (13) : 6589 - 6631
  • [50] Intrinsically disordered proteins: modes of binding with emphasis on disordered domains
    Morris, Owen Michael
    Torpey, James Hilary
    Isaacson, Rivka Leah
    OPEN BIOLOGY, 2021, 11 (10)